03/04/1991 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e Mr. Boles asked whether annexation is required at the time of development. Mr. Smith explained that all new development will go through a delay-of- annexation. Sewering would be required at the time of development, and all remaining SDCs would be collected following the effective date of annexation, depending on development activity. He acknowledged that it is possible for development to occur prior to the effective date of annexation without paying SDC charges. This is justified on the grounds that the area already has an existing storm drainage and transportation system, and therefore has little need for additional services. Responding to further question, Mr. Smith said that the vacant and underutilized lands in the area would not put additional capacity demands on the City because these systems are operated by the Coun- ty. The County would be expected to meet additional service needs in the area. e In response to a question from Mr. Nicholson, Mr. Smith said all development in the Highway 99 North area would be regulated by the Urbanizing lands Ordi- nance, which was adopted directly from City Code. Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr Boles, to direct the City Manager to execute the Highway 99 North policy and annexation agreements; and seek ordinance changes by lane County, rule changes by OEQ, and statutory changes by the legislature to implement these agreements. Mr. Rutan moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, to amend Section 4 of the Annexation and Urban Services Agreement to reflect a tax- differential rate that will cover approximately half the cost of a refinement plan. Responding to a question from Mr. Boles regarding the deferral of parking and paving requirements to the effective date of annexation, Mr. Smith explained that there are large costs associated with these requirements, which are largely aesthetic in nature. Mr. Boles voiced concern that property paving, which increases the capacity demand on the storm sewer, might occur prior to SDC collection. In response, Mr. Smith said that storm sewer SDCs would be collected at the point of sewer connection, which would not likely occur until annexation is effective. Roll call vote; the amendment carried unanimously, 7:0. Ms. Bascom extended her appreciation to Councilor Rutan, City staff, and all property owners involved in crafting this agreement. Mr. Nicholson said that while he supports the concept of phased-in annexa- tions, he is uncomfortable approving the agreement without further explora- tion of the fiscal impacts of the agreement and without some assurance that the City will be able to treat all residents with the equity. Mr. Nicholson moved, seconded by Mr. Boles, to table the ordi- nance until the April 8 City Council meeting. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council March 4, 1991 Page 9