07/27/1992 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e necessary because otherwise structures and land uses would be permitted that conflict with the compact urban growth planning process. Mr. Chenkin ex- plained that the percentage figures in the original Implementation Strategy 5 wording have been replaced with less prescriptive language that directs staff to work toward the business park concept, using code language as the basis for discussions with interested parties. Mr. Nicholson expressed his opinion that the original language is insuffi- ciently prescriptive. Jan Childs, Planning Director, stated that if the council adopts the substi- tute Implementation Strategies 4 and 5 language, the business park concept will be sent back through the Planning Commission process for hearings on the specific zoning code amendment. The industrial lands study does not include the Code amendments concurrent with the adoption of the study. Mr. Nicholson asked what would happen in the interim between council adoption of the substitute language and a Planning Commission hearing on the business park concept. Ms. Childs replied that the existing code language, which does not allow business parks, remains in effect until and unless the council amends it. Mr. Boles moved to amend Metropolitan Lands Special Study Inventory and Policy Recommendation and Policy report by replacing Priority One Implementation Strategies 4 and 5 concerning business park and campus industrial zones with the language set forth on page 2 of agenda item summary VI of the e council agenda dated July 27, 1992. Roll call vote; the motion passed 5:1 (Mr. Boles opposed). Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Rutan, that the bill as amended with unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by council bill number only, and enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 6:0. Council Bill 4401 was read the second time by number only. Mr. Boles moved, seconded by Mr. Rutan, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; the motion passed 4:2 (Councilors Boles and Nicholson opposed) and became Ordinance No. 19866. VII. PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION FOR ST. VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the topic. Larry Lawrence, Planning and Development Department, stated that St. Vincent de Paul (SVDP) is requesting a property tax exemption for 40 units of single-room occupancy housing for very low-income singles at 335 West 2nd Avenue. The exemption would allow SVDP to e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 27, 1992 Page 5 7:30 p.m.