Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that Items A through AA be <br />approved, affirmed, and filed as noted. Rollcall vote. Motion carried,- <br />all Council members present voting aye~ <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />III - Ordinances <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 176 - Zoning to\,C-2_~PD newly annexed area south of <br />Centennial Boulevard at east end of Centennial Loop <br />with Sign District designation of Outlying Commercial, read the first time <br />on February 12, 1973 and held pending approval of planned unit development, <br />was read the second time by council bill number and title only, there being <br />no council member present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />(1845) <br /> <br />Mr. 'Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and given <br />fin~l passage. Rollcall vote. All council members present voting aye, except, <br />Mr. Haws abstaining, the bill was declared passed and numbered 17237. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 704 - Vacating Berkeley Park pedestrian easements north of <br />18th Avenue between City View Stre~t and Oak Patch Road, <br />read the first time on January 13, 1975 and held lacking unanimous consent for second <br />reading, was read the second time by council bill number and title only, there being <br />no councilmembers present requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved $econded by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and <br />given final passage. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley explained his vote against second reading, holding the bill <br />from passage at the last meeting, was on the basis of a public policy issue. He ... <br />wondered whether the vacation would set precedent that would hold the Council in ~ <br />the future when developers were encouraged to dedicate pedestrian access; bike <br />paths, etc., in subdivisions. He was balancing the issue of access for children <br />to schools and playgrounds without having to use thoroughfares against the incon <br />venience and nuisance to owners of abutting properties. He said he had toured <br />the walkways and felt the effort should be made by, the city for better maintenance. <br />He suggested that educational programs could be carried on in the schools en- <br />couraging students to show due respect for abutting properties. He thought too <br />that through natural migration the elementary school children who were responsible <br />for the vandalism might not be there in a couple of years. But the permanent <br />decision to vacate the property based only on the nuisance and inconvenience factor <br />was not justified. <br /> <br />Rollcall vote was taKen on the motion to approve and pass. All council <br />members present voting aye, except Mr.' Bradley voting no, the bill was <br />declared passed and numbered 17238. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 705 - Vacating alley west of Jefferson Street north of <br />Cheshire Street, read the first time on January 13, <br />1975 and held lacking unanimous consent for second reading, was read the second <br />time by council bill number and title only, there being no council member present <br />requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and,given final <br />passage. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Mr. Bradley explained his vote ,against second reading of thiS bill was because <br />it was read in conjunction with. C.S. 704., He said he would have approved it at <br />that time had it been segregated. , <br /> <br />1/27/75 - 24 <br /> <br />40 <br />