Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Correspondence ftom Jack Mattison, attorney representing Georgia-Pacific, was <br />distribut~d to Council. Assistant Manager reviewed testimony brought out in panel~ <br />hearing and said that staff recommended assessments be levied as proposed against <br />abutting properties because they lie within 160 feet of the sewer line, had not 4It <br />previously been assessed, and it was felt they should share their portion of . <br />sewer costs as do other properties in the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and <br />given final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present <br />voting aye, except Councilman Bradley voting no, the bill was declared <br />passed and numbered 17323. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 774 - Levying assessments for special sewer levy in 2nd Addi- (2000) <br />tion to Shasta Gardens (74-1002) - read the first time <br />on March 24 and referred to April 7 hearing panel, and held over from the <br />April 14 Council meeting for consideration at this meeting - was read the second <br />time by council bill number and title only, there being no Council member pre- <br />sent requesting that it be read in full. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and given <br />final passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the <br />bill was declared passed and numbered 17324. <br /> <br />Council Bill No. 775 -Levying assessments for special sewer levy - Fred Meyer <br />PUD (75-1000) - read the first time on March 24 and <br />referred to April 7 hearing panel, and helf over from the April 14 Council <br />meeting for consideration at this meeting - was read the second time by council <br />bill number and title only, there being no Council membeF present requesting <br />that it be read in full. <br /> <br />.-tt <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Keller that the bill be approved and given <br />final 'passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye. <br />the bill was declared p~ssed and numbered 17325. <br /> <br />III - <br /> <br />Items acted upon with on motion after discussion of individual items if requested. <br />Previously discussed in committee on April 16 (Present: Council President Murray <br />[presiding], and Council members Keller, Beal, Williams, Bradley, Hamel, Haws, and <br />Shirey) and on April "23. 1975 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council member Murray, Keller, <br />Beal, Williams, Bradley, Hamel, Haws, and Shirey). Minutes of those meetings appear <br />below in italics. <br /> <br />A. <br /> <br />Legislative Subcommittee Recommendations - April 14., 1975 <br /> <br />The Legislative Subcommittee recommends that the Council oppose the .follo~ing <br />proposed legislation: . <br /> <br />H.B.3021 - A bill reserving lands on or near any waterways for special protection. <br />Whiltf1 the subcommittee endorses the purpose of this bill, which is to ex- <br />tend environmental protection to tide~iinds, rivers, lakes, and waterways <br />in general, we feel that the definitions are too broad since they would <br />inciude the wil1amette River. The subcommittee feels that the bill might <br />adversely affect the Governor's Wi11amette Greenway proposals and that. <br />tne.areas listed might better be covered under theLCDC bill either under <br />the so-called "critical areas" or under "shore line goals." <br /> <br />H.B.3026 - A very far~reaching land use compensation bill providing for compensation <br />to l~nd owners whose property loses value after a governmental land use <br />decision. Conversely, the bill requires payment by land owners. to local <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4/28/75 - 14 <br /> <br />\2..1 ~ <br />