03/22/1976 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

works director, explained that"this -project was now to the point where the Council needs to decide whether to proceed with the final design and call bids for award of contract. The Council has the option to make that decision without a public hearing, ~e said, but he advised that the people in the South willamette area have ~ the understanding that a public hearing would be held first. Mr. Gilman added that should the Council decide not to go ahead with improvement, staff would prefer knowing that at this point before spending more time and money on design work. By going through a public hearing with the property owners now, he said, the Council would hav~ a better basis for determining whether the improvement as proposed should proceed. Manager asked if public works staff would anticipate delegations from the neighbor- hoods at the Council meeting if the improvement project was an item on the consent calendar for approval. Mr. Gilman thought the property owners would not come back to the Council until the public hearing was held on contract award, after the design had been finalized and bids called. The public hearing proposed at this time, he said, was: just another step to determine ahead of time whether the Council wished to proceed. He agreed with Manager's statement that staff position was in favor of going ahead with the project. There was some discussion between Mayor Anderson and Councilman existing documentation with regard to the critical situation on and the number of times it had already been before the Council. that there would be three public hearings on the project before work - the one now proposed, one at time of contract award, and project is assessed. Haws wi th regard to the subject street It was brought out completion of the another when the Vote was taken on the motion to set public hearing for the April 12 Council meeting. Motion carried, all Council members present voting aye, except Councilman Haws voting no. ~ I. Sale, City-owned Lots - List of properties (foreclosed by the city because of unpaid assessment liens) on which bids were received by the finance department was presented: Lot 22, Block 5, 4th Addition to Southern Oaks (18-03-08-04-3212) John F. and Angeline S. Monahan bid $4,600.00 Lot 2, Block 5, 1st Addition to Southern Oaks (18-03-08-04-2924) John F.. and Angeline S. Monahan bid $3,800.00 Lot 9, Block 3, Barker Subdivision (17-03-33-43-6214) Flora G. Anderson bid $6,567.95 Lot 7, Block 3, Barker Subdivision (17-03-33-43-6212) Countryman Realty, Inc. Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan and Trust bid $4,652.00 Lot 8, Block 3, Barker Subdivision (17-03-33-43-6213) Countryman Realty, Inc. Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan and Trust bid $4,652.00 Lot 7, Block 3, 1st Addition to Southern Oaks (18-03-08-04-2921) Countryman Realty, Inc. Profit Sharing and Retirement Plan and Trust bid $3,652.00 Lot 5, B1~ck 1, Southern Oaks Addition (18-03-08-03-2905) Coun tryman Real ty, Inc. Profi t Sharing and Retiremen t Plan and Trust bid $3,652.00 Lot 6, Block 10, 5th Addition to Southern Oaks (18-03-08-04-2508) Richard w. and Lawauna Roebuck bid $3,626.00 3/22/76 - 16 t5.~/. e