Laserfiche WebLink
<br />pattern, he said the select link analysis only looks at traffic as it <br />goes through a select point. The particular model shows ten to 15 <br />percent of the traffic going through 6th-7th was going to the River <br />Rofaod area. That trafficsverYdlikelY Cd?Uld hbe coming ~rom the.univerhsity ~, <br />oregon or downtown. econ, regar lng t e noncorrldor proJects, e <br />said it was TPC's perspective that these were very important. Many of <br />them do relate to the capacity problem, such as 30th and Hilyard or 18th <br />and 19th couplet east of Willamette. Many of them relate to newly developed <br />areas, i.e., Ferry Street. Also, there are safety problems that many of <br />the noncorridor routes do address. Therefore, it was felt these to be <br />important to designate those for public acknowledgement. <br /> <br />Mr. Farah said the key word was "system". The street and highway system <br />is intended to serve the mObility of residents in the metropolitan area. <br />This relates to land use, the downtown area, Valley River Center, the <br />University of Oregon, and the West Eugene industrial area. Also, he noted <br />the 6th-7th avenue facility addresses policies such as Eugene will preserve <br />the downtown area; it serves a function of connecting residents of the <br />City; and serves the function of providing a high level of service to the <br />West Eugene industrial area. He said these projects have to be discussed <br />in the context of what they mean to the overall system. Regarding policies, <br />he said the Planning Commission did spend considerable time on them with <br />many modifications made that were intended to clarify staff work. Regard- <br />ing the facilities, specifically Ferry Street Bridge and Chambers connector, <br />he said the Planning Commission felt those were the two highest areas of <br />concern to prevent service level "E" occurring. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Delay, Mr. Farah said the transportation <br />model assumed a higher increase in dwelling units in the downtown area. ~ <br />If there is an attempt to preserve existing housing and seek rehabilitation, ~ <br />while on the other hand attempting to get the highest density out'of <br />structures that may not be in the best condition, there may not be a <br />dramatic increase in dwelling units. He said the issue was: Is this an <br />incorrect assumption made in T-2000? Two areas the growth management <br />study has not touched on: 1) Getting a greater intensity use of land <br />than is occurring now (i.e., concept of infilling); and 2) encouraging <br />housing in the areas that are not now designated for housing (i.e., south <br />of 13th and Willamette). These may increase density in the downtown area. <br /> <br />Mr. Delay wondered to what extent this model is predicated on these kinds <br />of projections. Mr. Farah said it is predicated on a high employment rate <br />in the downtown area, with the increased number of residents in the <br />downtown area creating a lessening of the transportation problem. Thus is <br />would be assumed more people would be walking, using bikes, etc. This is <br />not seen to be happening, but instead a greater dependency on the street, <br />highway, and transit system is currently occurring. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie questioned if the Planning Commission had a thorough re-evaluation <br />of the transit goals and of the level of service. James Bernhard, President <br />of the Planning Commission, said the Planning Commission had spent one <br />evening with the transit people on goals and policies in the plan relating <br />to how they could be obtained and their effect on land-use policies. It was <br /> <br />5/3178--8 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/3 <br />