08/28/1978 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. Public hearing was closed. e Res. No. 2988--Forwarding to Boundary Commission recommendation for annexation of property located south of Dillard Road, east of existing city limits of Eugene was read by number and title. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley that findings supporting the annexation as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 18, 1978, be adopted by reference thereto, and that the resolution be adopted. Rollcall vote. Moti on carri ed unanimously. C.B. 1746--Authorizing rezoning from County AGT Agriculture, Grazing, and Timber and County RA Suburban Residential Districts to City R-1 Single-Family Residential District, property located south of Dillard Road~ east of existing city limits of Eugene~ was read by number and title only, there being no Councilor present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley~ that findings support- ing the rezoning as set forth in Planning Commission staff notes and minutes of July 18, 1978, be adopted by reference thereto~ that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only~ with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council pill number only. - Mr. Hamel moved, seconded by Mr. Bradley, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll ca 11 vote. Motion carried unanimously 4nd the bill was declared passed and numbered 18256. 2. Located east of Capital Drive, south of existing city limits line (AZ 78-8) (Spencer Alpert) Denial recommended by Planning Commission July 18, 1978 Mr. Saul said there was one residence on the property at the present time and a swimming pool. The applicant said the primary purpose of annexation was to allow connection of the existing residence to the sewer. It would appear from materials submitted that there was some uncertainty as to the exact nature of the intent of annexation. In this instance it was determined that the sewers could not be extended to the east portion--Tax Lot 100--so, based on that, the inability to extend sewers existed and the Planning Commission recommended denial. Mr. Bradley and Mr. Haws indicated they would be abstaining on the motion due to a conflict of interest. No other ex parte contacts or conflicts of interest were declared by Councilors. Staff notes and minutes were entered as part of the record. Public hearing was opened. e 8/28/78--7 585