03/26/1980 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Smith moved~ seconded by Mr. Lieuallen~ that the bill be approved and given final passage. Roll call vote; all councilors ~ present voted aye~ with Mr. Obie out of the chamber~ and the bill .., was declared passed and numbered 18609. VI. j EWEB FACILITIES AGREEMENTS (memo distributed) Mr. Allen stated that both of these agreements are in order and approval is recommended. Res. No. 3336--A resolution authorizing the City Manager to grant EWEB a right-of-way and access permit on City property located at 450 North Fillmore Street for utility services Ms. Smith moved~ seconded by Mr. Lieuallen~ to adopt the resolu- tion. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. Res. No. 3337--A resolution authorizing the City Manager to grant EWEB a right-of-way and access permit on City property located at Mahlon Sweet Airport for utility services Ms. Smith moved~ seconded by Mr. Lieuallen~ to adopt the resolu- tion. Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. VII. CETA CONSORTIUM/PRIME SPONSOR OPTIONS (memo distributed) e Mr. Allen introduced Gary Long~ Special Staff Services Director~ to give background information. Mr. Long stated the staff memorandum outlined several options and recom- mendations for forming a City-County consortium board for the CETA program. Certain services would be provided by the City and the County separately. Intake~ placement~ and certain private-sector programs would be handled by joint contracting arrangements; a small administrative staff is proposed and could be housed with either the County or the City. This consortium proposal does not have the support of the Lane County staff and mayor may not be accepted by the Lane County Commissioners. If the council adopts the recommended course of action~ but Lane County fails to concur~ then the staff recommends that two cooperative but independent prime sponsors be formed. The staff recommendation is based on an analysis of the current Lane County program (Attachments D and E of staff memorandum). Attachments A through C are summaries of the pros and cons of the various options. Staff recommendation is made in the belief that it will improve efficiency~ improve participation results~ and reduce costs. They are proposing~ if the City becomes directly involved in CETA service delivery~ that the approach be through competitive bid and contracting processes. As indicated in this e 3/26/80--6