Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> " -. <br />1 ,', " <br /> , , <br />been transferred and consultant mark-ups are not included in the cost reductions. <br />Contractors are bei ng asked to ,reduce their charges. About $3 million has been <br />eliminated from the project and he feels he has a good handle on it. After . <br />discussion with the construction manager, it was concluded that extra work would <br />be based on the same projected fees. <br />In regard to the EPAC budget, the parking structure budget has,been added in to <br />the total cost. This information is the same that was presented to the Civic <br />Center Commission and they have approximately $17 million under contract at <br />this time. <br />Mr. Smith stated that project office costs are noted in the breakdown. They <br />have tried to economize by contracting services. Office space has been taken <br />out of the project expenses to reduce the total construction costs. Included <br />are professional services costs for the bond sale which,had not been anticipated. <br />The total Eugene Arts Foundation commitment is $447,812 and the need now is to <br />know when the money will be forthcoming. Mr. Smith stated that items are <br />prioritized on the buy-backs and deferral list. He indicated that he would <br />answer questions. <br />Mr. Obie stated that Mr. Smith had done a good job of outlining where the <br />City is now and how it got where it is. He does not feel that Mr. Jacob's <br />concerns regarding architectural fees have been directly addressed. The Arts <br />Foundation suggested a reduction. Mr. Obie asked if there needs to be discus- <br />sion with the architect regarding reduction. Mr. Smith responded that this has <br />been happening monthly. When the costs increase, so do the architect's fees. <br />The architectural fees are also based upon actions taken to extend the scope of <br />the project. The question is whether items are extras or if they are part of - <br />the project. That is where he tries to negotiate. <br />Mr. Obie stated that inflation has been a big factor, but the amount of work <br />remains the same. He asked if the City has to pay for overages. Mr. Smi th <br />responded that the City does have to pay for overages but that is where he tries <br />to negotiate. He used the example of the Rehearsal Hall and Green Room. <br />Mr. Obie noted that the Eugene Arts Foundation wanted to ask the architect <br />to forego fees caused by inflation. He asked if this had been addressed <br />with the architect. Mr. Smith stated that he is negotiating this right now. <br />Mr. Obie asked if the result would come back to the council. Mr. Smith stated <br />that he would provide a status report. The City is contractually obligated to <br />construction costs. It must be determined what is extra and what is not. Mr. <br />Obie noted that the council would like to participate in that decision. Mr. Obie <br />stated that in regard to the buy-backs of $1,448,000, the community does <br />not expect to have a center without an acoustical shell. <br />Mr. Lieuallen noted that there is no legal basis for argument with the architects <br />regarding reduction of fees due to inflation. They are not required to respond <br />to this. He said that the numbers can be arranged in many different ways, <br />whether including or excluding the parking structure, but the total cost will <br />remain the same--$24 million. <br /> .e <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 8, 1980 Page 8 <br />