Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> . <br /> ~ <br /> i(lf : words "the process of" be replaced with "formation or <br /> incorporation " <br /> Uj II. Jim Greer, representing Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, <br /> and <br /> Iral (see also written testimony, p. III-EE-l) , 3150 Main, <br /> thE Springfield, OR 97477 . He felt more specific requirements <br /> should be adopted to protect riparian areas in gener a 1 and areas <br /> n c <br /> 1 is near, waten.rays such as Bertelson Slough, Willow Creek, Pudding <br /> jli( Creek, Confluence Heronry and Greenway lands as provided in <br /> thl Goal 5 and Goal 15 requirements. <br /> 12. Ed Ramsey, 665 City View Blvd. , Springfield, OR 97477 , <br /> 35: supported amended change of light industrial on Piece Property. <br /> t( He expressed concern over North Gateway site being unserviced <br /> s <br /> realizing city services were available to the Pierce property. <br /> genl He requested a task force be formed to work out resolution of <br /> irea <br /> thl neighborhood concerns and to formulate a plan for industrial <br /> thl development which would be compatible with resident1al use. <br /> >ria: 13. Tom Heintz, 1038 Jayne Drive, Eugene, Or 97404, contended <br /> lent: <br /> River Road/Santa Clara poses no health hazard and objected to <br /> an <br /> fivl treatment. plant on flood plain. He opposed all wording <br /> regarding annexation of River Road/Santa Clara area. He also <br /> sene requested Council Members and Commissioners read House Bill <br /> 2759. <br /> R~' 14. John C. Neely, Jr. , (see also written testimony, pg. III -K-l and <br /> 2' III-U-l); objected to the whole Metropolitan Plan because it is, <br /> ,nsiv able to adversely affect the River Road/Santa Clara area, its <br /> whic people, and their health. He strongly opposed annexation of <br /> whe River Road/Santa Clara. <br /> >pose 15. Esther Loy, League of Women Voters, (see also written <br /> ty 0 <br /> iyste testimony, pg. III-O-l) 2603 Elinor, Eugene, OR 97403, <br /> Sb supported the Plan and amendments with a few additions. She <br /> c supported policies regarding River Road/Santa Clara; supported <br /> )n <br /> Audubon on Objective In, p. III -C-6 of the 11etropolitan Plan, <br /> (p. III-V-l of Planning Commission Testimony) for. buffer zones <br /> 1 ar: in urban development areas; supported the use of " s'hall" instead <br /> of " " the policy Chapter II I -C, "Environmental <br /> Suit may in new to <br /> Resources " Metropolitan Plan which reads: "Prior the <br /> pIt , to next <br /> update, a study may be initiated to examine ways, of buffering <br /> )w tl <br /> tl and protecting agricultural lands on the urban fringe from the <br /> :l effects of urban development." She expressed the need for <br /> :ugenl strong directives regarding wildlife impacts. She felt <br /> c thl compromises are fair and is proud of Plan. <br /> pal 16. Randall Hledik, Wildish Land Company, (see also written <br /> 0 testimony, III-N-l) P.O. Box 7428, Eugene, OR 9740 I. He <br /> read: pg. <br /> ill 1 suggested inclusion of certain properties in the vicinity of Clear <br /> Lake Road within the Urban Growth Boundary, contending there <br /> a nl <br /> ore, is full range of key public services and facilities immediately <br /> available to this area. The nature of the area could accomodate <br /> low cost construction. No significant wildlife -habitat would be <br /> II-5 <br /> r <br />