My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/20/06 Work Session
>
Item A: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:00:03 PM
Creation date
11/16/2006 8:51:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/20/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The question “Which building or structure would you rather remain in place, at least for a <br />while?” was also asked with the following responses: <br />Existing City hall building: 35 people <br />? <br /> <br />Butterfly parking lot/Rock N Rodeo: 4 people <br />? <br /> <br />Neither: 16 people <br />? <br /> <br /> <br />Concept Option Development <br />The concept options were refined to study a reduced police footprint on the ground floor, the <br />comparative opportunity for sustainable building features, and the impact of access to <br />underground parking. Refer to Attachment B for refined Concept Option diagrams. <br /> <br />In cooperation with the Eugene Police Department, police functions were rearranged to occupy <br />less area on the ground floor and more area on the upper floors. In general, functions with the <br />most public interaction are located on the ground floor or second floor. The patrol function, <br />which has the least public interaction, is located on the third floor. To facilitate quick and secure <br />access to parking and between levels, dedicated police elevators and stairs would be provided. <br /> <br />A cursory review of how each concept option could integrate sustainable building features <br />revealed that the options are relatively equal, with some providing more opportunity for daylight <br />and ventilation, and others providing more opportunity for rainwater harvesting and green roofs. <br /> <br />Access to underground parking is indicated in each option. Each point of access removes <br />approximately 5,000 SF of usable floor area from the ground floor of the building. When the <br />patrol function is included in City Hall, it is important that two points of vehicular access be <br />provided to mitigate access problems from potential blockages; if the patrol function is separate, <br />two points of access are desirable but not required. Due to the extent of displaced functions on <br />the ground floor, when patrol is included on the Butterfly Lot/ Rock N Rodeo site, the second <br />access point is shown outside the building footprint. The refined diagrams illustrate a variety of <br />possible access points and their impact on the concept options. <br /> <br />Comparative Concept Cost Models <br />The design team prepared cost models that assume an identical level of quality for each option, <br />but identify potential cost differences such as the size of the exterior envelope, size of open <br />space, surcharge for non-essential functions built as an Essential Services structure, and the <br />police consolidation variations. The differences in cost between the various concept options, <br />while measurable, are not significant enough to be the deciding factor by themselves in choosing <br />between options. However, one issue related to cost that has not yet been fully explored is the <br />cost of replacement parking for the County’s 228 spaces in the Butterfly Lot. Refer to <br />Attachment C for Comparative Concept Cost Models of each option. <br /> <br />Police Department Functionality in a New City Hall <br />In working toward a community policing model, the Chief of Police has recommended <br />accommodating 10 years of growth (from the date of move-in) for patrol functions in lieu of the <br />20 years of growth identified for other City Hall functions, thus reducing the area required for <br />police functions by approximately 6,000 SF. Growth for patrol beyond 10 years would then be <br />accommodated by a second precinct facility in the future. <br /> <br />L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M061120\S061120A.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.