My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 11/20/06 Work Session
>
Item A: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:00:03 PM
Creation date
11/16/2006 8:51:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/20/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Hall Complex – Police Patrol Options <br /> <br /> <br />structure leads to higher cost and reduced efficiency. As well, locating the main patrol function <br />in a downtown City Hall building adds approximately 30,000 square feet of below-grade <br />structured parking – parking that could be provided at lower cost if the patrol facility is not <br />collocated with City Hall. These issues are further exacerbated in the half-block concept. The <br />inclusion of police patrol adds at minimum one floor to a new City Hall building when <br />constrained to a half-block site as well as the very substantial structured parking requirements. <br /> <br />Although the EPD has enjoyed a single office location in the past, the organization is too large <br />to effectively office and stage from a single facility. As the City and department continue to <br />grow, efficient use of facilities becomes increasingly important. Many cities similar in size (and <br />virtually all larger cities) divide their police operations between multiple facilities. Though it <br />might be preferable from a purely in-person communications perspective to locate all police <br />functions in a single facility, technology has significantly mitigated this concern. As was <br />discussed in the previous section, patrol officers and their district commanders are not normally <br />in the City Hall building even now, except at the start and end of shifts. <br /> <br />Information from the most recent public forum indicates that a substantial majority of those <br />involved in the discussion view the addition of the patrol function to the new City Hall as both <br />more expensive than necessary and as detracting from the functionality of the City Hall building <br />since patrol offices and parking are not public access facilities. <br /> <br />Options <br /> <br />Although there are several options remaining for the City Hall project, the project scope can be <br />further narrowed by making a decision on the police patrol options. Police Administration needs <br />to remain in close proximity to City Hall administrative offices and Police Investigations needs to <br />remain in close proximity to the courts. For this reason, separating police functions entirely from <br />City Hall is not presented as an option. Unlike other decisions, to do nothing is not a viable <br />option in this case, leaving essentially two basic options: <br /> <br />1. Develop the City Hall project with the main police patrol facility collocated within City <br />Hall. <br /> <br />2. Develop the City Hall project with the main police patrol facility separate from City Hall <br />and develop a separate project for locating the main police patrol facility elsewhere. <br /> <br />There is no community policing benefit or detriment to either option. Option Two is functionally <br />and operationally preferable. <br /> <br />Police Chief’s recommendation <br />In this case, operational and cost reasons lead one to the same conclusion as apparent public <br />preference – continue the development of the City Hall project without the inclusion of the main <br />police patrol facility and engage a separate project to serve that need (Option Two). <br /> <br />The best balance of cost containment, efficiency, and effectiveness of facilities would suggest <br />that a good general site area for a patrol facility would be near the Roosevelt Yard where police <br />nd <br />vehicles are serviced and fueled and 2/Chambers where the Training Center is located. The <br />single greatest generator of extra vehicle trips is to fuel and service vehicles. Most of EPD’s <br />larger meetings are already held at the Training Center. Similar to the 9-1-1 and Training <br />Center, a patrol facility in this area can be discretely secure and utilize surface parking. EPD’s <br />downtown patrol presence would be retained, perhaps enhanced with the addition of a City Hall <br />public safety station. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.