Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />6/15/2017 6/22/2017 7 Incident Review: <br />Conduct <br />Dismissed: <br />Complainant <br />withdrew <br />complaint <br />RP reported a officer she had known in the past <br />was harassing her on Facebook. <br />Dismissed: Complainant withdrew complaint. <br />6/16/2017 6/21/2017 5 Performance RP alleged an officer did not use turn signals on <br />various occasions while RP was following him. <br />Dismissed: Employee not identified <br />6/19/2017 7/11/2017 22 Performance RP was unhappy that he has been unable to get <br />an officer to return his calls concerning a case <br />with a theft by his neighbor. <br />Supervisor spoke with RP and found that PR has since spoken <br />with the officer and is happy with how the case is moving forward. <br />6/19/2017 6/26/2017 7 Inquiry RP was unhappy that her case had still not made <br />it to the DA's office after being told numerous <br />times it was being sent. <br />Sgt. found that a miscommunication had occurred over who sent <br />the cases over, the records department or the officers. The officer <br />did not understand it was his responsibility to get it to the DA's <br />office. A correction was made and the case sent over. Sgt spoke <br />with RP. <br />6/20/2017 7/20/2017 30 Courtesy RP complained that he was stopped and cited <br />for having his dog in the park and that the officer <br />was rude and disrespectful and that a later date <br />the officer saw him at the diner and made a rude <br />comment about his dog. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV and found the officer to be courteous and <br />within policy while issuing the citation. It was also found that the <br />officer was on duty as a School Resource officer that day of the <br />alleged 2nd incident (and did not contact RP). RP did not return <br />phone calls to discuss the complaint. <br />6/20/2017 6/21/2017 1 Inquiry <br />Dismissed: <br />Other <br />RP reported he did not have all of his knives <br />returned after his arrest, and that the ICV <br />supports his claim. <br />Dismissed: Other After Auditor's review of ICV. <br />6/19/2017 6/29/2017 10 Inquiry RP was unhappy that a bike she bought from a <br />EPD auction was taken from her and given to a <br />man that claimed it had been stolen from him 2 <br />years prior. <br />Sgt. reviewed the issue and found that the original owner had <br />provided proof of ownership and the officer rightfully returned the <br />bike to the owner. At the time of the burglary the owner did not <br />have the serial number to report, once he reported that number <br />significant time had passed and the number was not linked to the <br />report, hence it had been recovered but not linked up to the report. <br />Reporting Party was directed to file a Risk claim with the city and <br />received reimbursement for the amount she paid for the bike. <br />Appendix B Page 15 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2