Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />11/2/2017 11/13/2017 11 Performance RP was unhappy with how a traffic accident <br />involving his wife was handled and felt she was <br />treated dismissively. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV of the incident and found that officers did not <br />arrive on the scene until after medics had examined and released <br />RP's wife, and that she appeared to be ok. An officer provided her <br />a ride from the scene at her request. Sgt. spoke with RP about the <br />incident and explained EPD policy involving accident scenes. <br />11/1/2017 11/15/2017 14 Inquiry RP contacted an officer about an incident that he <br />had witnessed. <br />Lt. contacted the RP, who was happy with their discussion. <br />11/3/2017 12/13/2017 40 Policy RP was unhappy that officers told her she could <br />not be a witness in an incident involving her <br />boyfriend. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV of the investigation by the officer and learned <br />that he did take a statement from RP, but noted to her and her <br />boyfriend that he would need to seek video surveillance to <br />substantiate the allegation, as RP was not a impartial witness. No <br />policy violations were noted. Sgt. spoke with RP. <br />11/3/2017 11/20/2017 17 Performance RP asked that an officer who cited her be <br />informed that the citation she received was not <br />eligible for the program he told her about. <br />Sgt. spoke with RP and then updated the officer on the issue. <br />11/6/2017 11/11/2017 5 Inquiry RP was unhappy that his son was stopped by an <br />officers while walking home from school on two <br />separate occasions. <br />Lt. learned that RP's son was with a subject who was thought to <br />have been involved in an incident of vandalism. RP's son was not <br />a suspect and was treated respectfully by the officer. Sgt. spoke <br />with RP about the incident. <br />11/8/2017 12/1/2017 23 Performance RP was upset that an officer stopped in the <br />middle of the road with no lights and sirens and <br />blamed him when an elderly driver hit the side of <br />this mirror as they were merging from 2 lanes to <br />one. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV of the incident, found a couple of coaching <br />issues and spoke with the officer and with RP about the incident. <br />11/9/2017 11/20/2017 11 Policy RP was concerned at how often EPD vehicles <br />speed down his street on calls. RP lives near a <br />school and even though the officers use lights <br />and sirens he feels it is too fast. <br />Sgt. spoke with RP and offered to forward his concerns to the <br />Professional Standards and Training Lieutenant. <br />11/5/2017 11/20/2017 15 Inquiry RP alleged that an officer did not take action <br />because she was a minority woman. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV and found that the officer had made his <br />decisions based on the information discovered in the investigation. <br />Nothing indicated the officer made any decisions based on RP's <br />race or gender. Sgt. spoke with RP about his findings. <br />Appendix B Page 28 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2