Laserfiche WebLink
2017 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed Date Time Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />11/6/2017 11/22/2017 16 Incident Review: <br />Use of Force <br />RP felt that an officer's contact with a juvenile <br />was a little harsh. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV of the incident and found that the juvenile was <br />physically trying to hurt the officer and CAHOOTS employee. The <br />interaction was calm and controlled as the officer explained that he <br />could hurt the juvenile if he needed to keep himself and the others <br />in the room safe. The officers involved were professional and <br />maintained composure throughout the incident. <br />11/11/2017 12/22/2017 41 Performance RP got conflicting information about trying to <br />report a hit and run with no suspects. <br />Supervisor reviewed the call and spoke with RP to clarify any <br />misunderstandings about RP's situation. <br />11/13/2017 12/28/2017 45 Performance RP feels he was not taken seriously when he <br />reported an assault. <br />Review of the contact between RP and the officers taking his <br />report found no policy violations by the officers; in fact, they could <br />have charged RP as well but did not. RP did not return calls from <br />the Sgt <br />11/15/2017 12/1/2017 16 Performance RP was upset that an officer did not double lock <br />his hand cuffs, that he used a patch on RP's <br />jacket to justify drawing his service weapon, that <br />the officer did not have his body cam on, and <br />that the officer hit RP's head on the car door <br />when removing him from the vehicle. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV, which was turned on, and found that at initial <br />handcuff placement, they were not double locked, but that the <br />officer soon checked on the RP and noticed the cuffs and <br />completed that action. The employee did not remove the gun from <br />the holster. <br />11/17/2017 12/21/2017 34 Performance RP was unhappy that an officer would not tell <br />him the details of an investigation into a noise <br />complaint he called in. <br />Sgt. reviewed BWV and concluded that the officer handled the call <br />correctly. When the officer tried to tell RP the information he <br />asked for, RP became upset and would not listen. RP did not <br />return calls from Sgt. <br />11/22/2017 1/26/2018 64 Incident Review RP reported an incident in 2014 in which she <br />was frisked by an officer and was touched in her <br />crotch area. <br />Review by Sgt. of police reports and interviews of officers at the <br />scene of RP arrest found no evidence that an improper frisk <br />happened. Auditor dismissed due to timeliness. <br />11/25/2017 12/20/2017 25 Inquiry RP was unhappy that officer did not allow medics <br />to examine her because she was too disorderly, <br />and that they threw a hood over her head. <br />BWV showed that RP was highly intoxicated and was rude and <br />resistive to medics and law enforcement officers. RP refused <br />medical treatment. RP did not return calls to speak about the <br />incident. <br />11/27/2017 1/16/2018 49 Performance RP was unhappy with an officer's response to his <br />call about a vehicle parked illegally on his street. <br />Sgt. reviewed the officer's ICV which documented the car's <br />location and showed that the violation was not one that allowed the <br />officer to tow the vehicle. Sgt. spoke with RP and gave him <br />information about the contact and how to reach parking control for <br />such issues in the future. <br />11/27/2017 12/28/2017 31 Performance RP reported a EPD vehicle driving without <br />headlights. <br />Sgt. was unable to identify employee involved. RP had requested <br />no call back. <br />Appendix B Page 29 of 32 September 24, 2018, Work Session – Item 2