My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/18/05 WS
>
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:25 PM
Creation date
7/14/2005 9:55:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Element B: Mayor and Council Support OverallRating 2 <br />Satisfied <br /> <br /> 1 2 3 4 5 Indicators <br /> ! _ _ X _ 1. Does the Manager develop an adequate range of <br /> ii ~1 clear options and recommendations for Council <br /> ,,[ consideration? <br /> <br /> _ _ X _ _ 2. Does the Manager seek advice and direction on <br /> key issues from Mayor and Council? <br /> _ _ X _ _ 3. Does the Manager build positive working <br /> relationships with individual Councilors? <br /> <br /> ..... 4. Do Councilors have equal influence with the <br /> Manager? <br /> <br /> _ X _ _ _ 5. Is Council kept informed of critical issues in a <br /> timely manner? <br /> _ _ _ X _ 6. Does the Manager's staff provide timely and <br /> effective support to Council? <br /> <br /> _ _ X I _ _ 7. Does the Manager choose appropriate and timely <br /> ~ items when setting Council agendas? <br /> i i [ X ] 8. Are the Manager's oral and written <br /> I communications comprehensive and <br /> understandable? <br /> <br /> X 9. Is the Manager receptive to constructive <br /> - ~ ~ ~ criticism? <br /> X - 10. Are Council information requests followed-up in <br /> a timely manner? <br /> Comments including examples of past performance to support your appraisal <br /> This area has not improved and even gotten worse over the past year. All my comments from last <br /> year still stand. A few additional specifics from this year: <br /> (1)Routinely, I hear nothing about most of the items I raise in my 1-on-1 meetings unless I bring <br /> them up again in a 2nd and even 3rd monthly meeting. <br /> (2)The manager announced the ICMA/PERF review contract as a done deal and then went to <br /> Council to ask for the $100K+ to do it. This was backward and marginalizing. Since the request <br /> involved substantial unbudgetedfunds, the manager put Council in an almost impossible <br /> situation by announcing the contract to the press before consulting with Council. <br /> (3)Good news: I'm not getting as many surprises when I open the newspaper as the previous <br /> year. However, there have still been instances of this. For example, last fall when problems came <br /> 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.