My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 07/18/05 WS
>
Item C: City Manager Evaluation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:25 PM
Creation date
7/14/2005 9:55:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
up with ORI building, the mayor was informed but not the councilors. I was disappointed when I <br />brought this to the manager's attention and his response was to say "what could you have done <br />with the information if you received it?" Such a question is beside the point. <br /> <br />(4)After Council had a great strategic planning retreat in February, it took a lot of push-back <br />from Council to get draft action plans brought to us before the fall. I was surprised that it seemed <br />to be news to the manager that we would like to get started with Council discussion of our <br />strategic issues sooner than six months after our retreat. <br /> <br />(5)There's an understandably delicate line between the manager providing Council with his <br />professional advice (which I very much want) and seeming to join the debate as if he were the <br />ninth councilor. On several occasions this past year, I was dismayed when I felt the manager had <br />dramatically crossed that line. One example that comes to mind was the Budget Committee <br />discussion of the central core police patrol motions. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.