Laserfiche WebLink
policy question in that the City was prioritizing this public works acquisition seemingly because the City <br />could afford the land and had a willing seller, though it could not afford to develop it at this time as there <br />were so many other needs. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Bettman, City Manager Taylor stated that the acquisition was in <br />the master plan for the site, the property had been appraised, and deletion of it would be to forego an <br />opportunity to acquire the land for a favorable price. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon disagreed with the characterization of the price as "reasonable." She stressed that the <br />price per acre was $340,000 for land that abutted the railroad tracks. She questioned the desirability of the <br />area, calling the price for the property "astonishing." <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson asked staff to delineate the implications of delaying action. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kurt Corey recognized the concern with property values, noting the City recently <br />purchased property around the Eugene depot that on an acreage basis would have been three to four times <br />more than the amount of the appraised price of the property in question. He stated that the appraised price <br />was the price the property would cost on the market, adding that any number of appraisers would provide a <br />range which ultimately would boil down to an agreement between a buyer and a seller. He said the <br />property price was due, in part, to income generation from the property. He related that this purchase was <br />the last remaining component of the Roosevelt Boulevard Master Plan and conveyed his willingness to <br />bring any necessary information before the council in order to move the purchase along. <br /> <br /> Councilor Pap~ called for the question. Roll call vote; the motion passed, 7:1; Coun- <br /> cilor Poling voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Nathanson felt the most critical need at the present time was to address the handling of lost cats, <br />stray cats, and cat reproduction. She stated that there were topics that needed to be covered with regard to <br />the various agencies that were currently involved, including animal control, shelter for lost and abandoned <br />animals, and spay and neuter services. She stressed the imminent need for the service, but suggested the <br />council not go beyond the six-month need in order to allow other funding options to be explored. <br /> <br /> Councilor Nathanson, seconded by Councilor Meisner, moved to allocate $15,078 <br /> from the General Fund Contingency Account to fund cattery services at the Lane <br /> County Animal Regulation Authority (LCARA) for feral cats only through the fiscal <br /> year 2004. <br /> <br /> Councilor Taylor, seconded by Councilor Kelly, moved to substitute a motion to take <br /> $26,000 from the General Fund Contingency Account to fund for the remainder of <br /> Fiscal Year 2004 a contract with LCARA to restore cattery services to the level of <br /> services purchased by the City prior to the budget reductions for FY04. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor asserted it was not just feral cats that were the problem. She averred that the council <br />should not just provide a temporary fix to the situation. She commented on the fecundity of cats, stating <br />that the population, if left unchecked, would quickly become more than a nuisance. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 1, 2003 Page 14 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />