Ordinance No. 20258 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

conditions to 91 percent in 2015 under the Financially Constrained TransPlam This represents an increase of approximately 75 pement. PM 21: Bikeway k~iles Th/s measure indicates the additional bikeway miles and percentage change ~n b/&eway miles anticipated over the plarmhag period. As described Under PM 15, ~ddifior~ to the off-Skeet system and Striping of existing roadways result ha a significant/ncrease in bikeway miles (t 03 percent over existing conditions). ~ 22. Artertal and Collector Miles This measure indicates the additional roadway centerline miles and percentage change ha roadway centerl~e miles anticiPated over the pl period. Total m~les ofcollectgr and a~terials are prOPosed to hacrease by g- 9.3 percer~t from 325.6 to S544) 355.8. P][~ 23: Arterial and Collector Miles (excluding freeways) Th~s measure is sknilar to PM19a except that it excludes freeway miles. Total miles of collector and ~fials, exclud~g freeWays~ are proposed to ~ncrease by gt~out ¢-10 pement from 290.5 to Summary Assessment This section provides an overall assessment of the plan~s performance. A more detailed assessment of the plan's COmpliance with Transportation Platming Rule (TPR) requ/rements is provided in Part Three: TPR Alternative Performance Measures. Over the past 25 years, growth ha the region ?ms been fairly compact~ This is in part due to the limitations put on partitioning of parcels outside of city l~ts and altowhag development to occur o~y with the extension ofpubtic facilities. Thus, ~nfill and redevelopment have been mkSng place over time and, as a reset, a large portion of fi~ture development Mil occur M~ the UGB on the edges of existing development. As demonstrated above, grov,~h on the edges leads to longer overall ~p len~, which/n turn~ makes non-auto modes less attractive. Th~s makes it difficult to achieve VMT reductions w/ttfin the plannkng period. However~ the Financially Constmkned TransPlan has been shown to perform much better than trend conditions ha ng ~ncreases kt congested miles oftraveI, and m~hag area-wide congestion. An overall outcome st from implementation of nodal development ~s that the region is able to/ncrease the percentage of Person ~Ps less than one mile in length to approxknately 16 percent. Invesunents h~ non-auto modes ~arficularly BRT) and knplementation of nodal development strategies kn, prove choices available for tr~vel and contfil~nte to the F/nanc~ally Constrained Tran$Plan ~s abiliW to kmrease levels of non-auto mode share of all trips over existing conditions (hacrease from 14.1% to 17%). IncreaSes ~ the percentage ofhouseholds and emPl%~ent with access to te te ~it service are the basis for the 48.6 percent hacrease ha transit mode share~ The Financially Constrahaed TransPlan also calls for kmrenses ~n the percentage of TransPlan Chapter 4, Page 15 Exhibit A - Page 60 TransPlan Amendments