Laserfiche WebLink
System PMI 5 Ratio of Bikeway to Arterial and 82% 81% <br />Characteristics Collector Miles (PM24) <br /> <br /> PM21 Bikeway Miles 257.6 257.8 <br /> PM22 74 75.3 <br /> <br /> Priority Bikeway Miles * <br /> PM23 Arterial and Collector Miles <br /> <br /> PM24 Arterial and Collector Miles <br /> (excluding freeways) <br />· LCd,ApproVed Alternative Performance Measure <br /> <br />351.9 <br /> <br />315.7 <br /> <br />355.8 <br /> <br />3t9.6 <br /> <br />These mendmems to TransPlan MI1 allow completion of the final supplemental Enviromental <br />Impact Smement for the West Eugene parkway while resulting in only minor revisions to the <br />2015 FinanciallY,Constrained perforrnance measures. <br /> <br /> ance with OAR 660-0t2-0060: <br />Under ORS 660-0!20-0060(!), amendments m acknoMedged comprehensive plans and land use <br />reg~ations which "si~ficantly affecf' a transportation facility must "assure that allowed land <br />roes are consistem M~ the idemified ~nction~ capaci~i and perfomance s~d~ds (e.g., level <br />ofse~ieei v°Ime t° CapaCity ratio, etci) ofthe facility. If there is no significant effect~ OAR <br />660-0!2-0060 does not apply, Under OAR 660-012-0060(2), a plan or land use regulation <br />amen~em !~significan~ly affects" a transportation facility if it (a) changes the ac~owledged <br />functional classification of an existing or Planned transportation facility; (b) changes standards <br /> ming ~e functional ctasification system; (c) allows types or levels of land uses which <br />would resuk in levels of/ravel or access inconsistent with the functional classification of the <br />facility; or (d)reduces the performance standards of the facility below the minimum acceptable <br />level identified in the TSP. <br /> <br />None of the roadway amendments fhlt within-items (a) through ¢) above~ To <br />determine if any of the amendments m the 20~Year Financially Cons~ained Roadway project list <br />mducethe performance standards of the facility below the minim~m'i acceptable level identified <br />inthe TSP, the 20t5 pm peak horn level of service for the ~P-related amendment package was <br />compared with the 2015 pm peak hour level of service for the December 2001 TransPlan. <br /> <br />Seventeen (t7)locations were analyzed. Baed on the level of service analysis, projected level of <br />service at all I°¢atiom except two either stays the s~e or improves under the WEP.related <br />mendment package, ~e two exceptions are: Beltline, River Road-Delta, where the 2015 pm <br />peak'hour level of service decreases from LOS D to LOS E eastbound and from LOS E to LOS F <br />westbound; and Bekline~ no~ of West 11a Avenue, where the 2015 pm peak hour level of <br />services decreases for LOS C or better to LOS D eastbound. <br /> <br />OAR 660-012~0060(!) provides fo~ remedies when a proposed Plan arnendrnent "significantly <br />affects a transportation facility," any one of which is sufficient to address the Transportation <br /> Rule requirement~ For the TransPlan amendments, the relevant remedy is (I)¢)which <br />sates: "Am-lending the TSP to provide tranSportation facilities adequate to support the proposed <br /> <br />Traris?l~ and Metro plan ~endments <br />E~ibit C ~: F~dings <br /> <br />page 11 <br /> <br /> <br />