My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 5-20-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2019
>
05-20-19
>
Agenda Packet 5-20-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2019 9:32:51 AM
Creation date
5/10/2019 9:29:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
5/20/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
5/20/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 7, 2019 Clear & Objective Update – Draft Land Use Code Language Page 28 of 32 <br />property for the improvements has been signed by the property owner <br />seeking the subdivision, and the petition has been accepted by the city <br />engineer. <br />These changes relate to COM-03 (Bonding Requirement). The proposed changes would remove this <br />requirement from application requirements and add the requirement to approval criteria. <br />9.8440 Site Review Approval Criteria- General/Discretionary. The planning director shall <br />approve, conditionally approve, or deny the site review application. Approval or <br />conditional approval shall be based on compliance with the following criteria: <br />This change is related to COM-12 (Review Track Renaming) and revises code references to the currently named <br />General approval criteria. The General track is proposed to be called “General/Discretionary.” <br />9.8445 Site Review Approval Criteria- [Needed] Housing/Clear and Objective. Unless the <br />applicant elects to use the discretionary criteria contained in EC 9.8440 Site Review <br />Approval Criteria- General/Discretionary, for housing applications entitled to clear <br />and objective review pursuant to state statute, [T]the planning director shall approve, <br />conditionally approve, or deny the site review application. [Unless the applicant elects to <br />use the general criteria contained in EC 9.8440 Site Review Approval Criteria – General, <br />where the applicant proposes needed housing, as defined by the State statutes, the <br />planning director shall approve, or approve with conditions, a site review] based on <br />compliance with the following criteria: <br />These changes are related to COM-12 (Review Track Renaming) and revise code references to the currently <br />named General and Needed Housing tracks. The General track is proposed to be called “General/Discretionary” <br />and the Needed Housing track is proposed to be called “Housing/Clear and Objective.” This change also clarifies <br />that this section is only applicable to “housing applications entitled to clear and objective review pursuant to <br />state statute.” <br />(1)[The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed housing is needed housing as <br />defined by state statutes.] The proposal complies with EC 9.5860 Transition <br />Standards. <br />This change implements COS-01 (Clear & Objective Compatibility). The replacement text points to proposed <br />new transistion standards. For ease of use and code efficiency (as the standards will apply to three application <br />types), the new transition standards are proposed to be located under EC 9.5860 Transition Standards for <br />Housing/Clear and Objective Applications. Applicability is clear as the approval criteria for each of the three <br />application types will include a criterion requiring compliance with the transition standards. In addition, the <br />transition standards start with an applicability statement that identifies the three application types and <br />proposed uses subject to the standards. <br />(3)For areas not included on the city’s acknowledged Goal 5 inventory, the proposal <br />will preserve existing natural resources by compliance with [all of the following: <br />(a)The proposal complies with] the provisions of EC 9.6880 through EC 9.6885 <br />Tree Preservation and Removal Standards. <br /> [(b) Natural resource areas designated on the comprehensive plan diagram as <br />“Natural Resource” are protected.] <br />May 20, 2019, Work Session – Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.