My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 6-19-19 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
City Council
>
2019
>
06-19-19
>
Agenda Packet 6-19-19 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 10:24:47 AM
Creation date
6/14/2019 10:21:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Work Session
City_Council_Meeting_Date
6/19/2019
City_Council_Effective_Date
6/19/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Appendix B Page 34 of 48 <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed <br />Date <br />Time <br />Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />9/5/18 10/3/18 28 Inquiry RP reported an incident he observed <br />downtown in which officers were <br />interacting with a large African American <br />man, one officer called the man big boy. <br />Sgt. learned that officers made contact with the man due to him <br />menacing people with a large stick. The officer was able to talk <br />to the man calming him and officers did not have to use force to <br />arrest him. By using calm reassuring tones the officer de- <br />escalated the situation. The body cam showed that the officer <br />was using the language in regard to the man's size and not in an <br />intentionally derogatory way. <br />9/5/18 10/16/18 41 Policy RP felt that the motorcycle officers <br />posted downtown should be setting a <br />better example and no riding on the <br />sidewalk or blocking pedestrian <br />crossings. He also found them to be <br />condescending when he spoke with <br />them about it. <br />Sgt. reviewed the complaint and reached out to RP who did not <br />return voicemails. Sgt. noted that in carrying out their duties <br />officer at times do block crosswalks and even have their cycles on <br />the sidewalk. <br />9/6/18 9/11/18 5 Inquiry RP alleged a female officer dislocated <br />her shoulder. <br />Sgt. review of the incident found no female officer was on the <br />scene and that RP was highly intoxicated during the incident. <br />9/6/18 10/16/18 40 Policy RP was unhappy that officers awoke her <br />at 0600 and told her she had to move. <br />RP was not on private property. <br />Sgt. reviewed body cams and found the officers to be polite and <br />professional with RP, explained the reason for the contact and <br />educated RP on the court ruling that had been handed down, but <br />did not apply to her in this situation. Sgt. spoke with RP about <br />the contact. <br />9/10/18 10/1/18 21 Performance RP reported a suicidal female in the <br />street, with no response from EPD. <br />Call records reviewed by the supervisor found that the call takers <br />had in deed followed protocol and had dispatched Cahoots to <br />help the woman. The supervisor found that one call taker did not <br />inform RP that Cahoots was on scene when she called back. <br />9/11/18 9/14/18 3 Inquiry <br />Dismissed: <br />Other <br />RP alleged an officer tried to tell him he <br />couldn't text a friend who is a Sheriff's <br />Deputy. <br />Dismissed: Other Review by the Auditor <br />found no conversation in which the officer told RP he could not <br />text his friend. <br />June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.