Laserfiche WebLink
2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Appendix B Page 22 of 48 <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed <br />Date <br />Time <br />Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />6/22/18 6/27/18 5 Performance <br />Dismissed: <br />Timeliness <br />RP alleged an officer did not iron out his <br />issues with LTD. <br />Dismissed: Timeliness <br />6/26/18 7/16/18 20 Courtesy RP reported an officer who responsed <br />"Alligator Bite" to a question about what <br />was going on in his neighborhood <br />Sgt. spoke with the officer who admitted it was a bad attempt at <br />humor and apologized for upsetting RP with the comment. Sgt. <br />spoke with RP about the incident. <br />6/22/18 6/29/18 7 Courtesy RP felt an officer was rude and would <br />not listen to his side of the story when <br />he was being trespassed from a store. <br />Sgt. reviewed body cam and found that the officer took the time <br />to go into the store and review the security tape, and then (at <br />the request of the store manager) issued the trespass notice. <br />6/27/18 7/16/18 19 Performance RP was unhappy that when she has <br />called EPD about issues near her <br />Conestoga Hut she rarely gets service, <br />but when she had a slight altercation <br />with a woman near her home and that <br />person called officers showed right up. <br />RP wonders if it's because she is <br />homeless. <br />Sgt. spoke with RP about how calls are prioritized and that a call <br />about drug activity and smoking near her Conestoga hut would <br />be a lower priority than an active dispute call and that calls are <br />not prioritized by the status of the complainant. <br />6/28/18 8/13/18 45 Performance RP was unhappy with the length of time <br />it took for an officer to respond to his <br />tenants call for service regarding racial <br />and sexually biased language from a <br />roommate. <br />Sgt. reviewed the incident and found that an officer had <br />responded the next day and taken a report. In one of the <br />situations, the tenant had declined to press charges. Sgt. <br />contacted RP and spoke to him about the findings. <br />6/28/18 7/9/18 11 Courtesy RP reported officers were rude when she <br />questioned them about an incident she <br />was observing. <br />Sgt. reviewed body cam and found that officers were <br />professional but direct in requesting RP to move back from the <br />situation. <br />6/28/18 7/13/18 15 Inquiry RP was unhappy that her 15 year old son <br />was given a citation for crossing the <br />street against a light. RP noted that cars <br />can turn after checking for traffic. <br />Sgt. reviewed the body cam of the officer who issued the citation <br />which clearly showed RP's son cross a busy intersection against <br />the light. Sgt. spoke with RP about the safety issue to her son in <br />this incident and the law that allows citations for disregarding a <br />pedestrian cross signal. <br />7/2/18 8/1/18 29 Inquiry <br />Dismissed: <br />Other <br />RP emailed about a friend who had a bad <br />experience with EPD but provided no <br />date, time or details of the situation. <br />Dismissed: Other RP did not response to <br />an email to provide further detail. <br />June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2