Laserfiche WebLink
2018 Incident Reviews, Inquiries, Policy Complaints, and Service Complaints <br />Appendix B Page 32 of 48 <br />Received <br />Date <br />Closed <br />Date <br />Time <br />Open <br />(days) <br />Classification Summary Outcome <br />8/23/18 9/24/18 31 Inquiry RP was upset that when she was pulled <br />over for not having a light on her bike, <br />they discovered she had bought it from a <br />party that had stolen the bike. The bike <br />was confiscated and she was left to walk <br />home in the dark. <br />Review of body cam showed that the officers did confiscate the <br />bike once they learned it was stolen and RP did not ask for <br />assistance in transportation. Sgt. spoke with RP about the <br />incident. <br />8/24/18 9/25/18 31 Policy RP inquired in to EPD's policy concerning <br />trespass and who and who is not a <br />tenant. <br />Sgt. contacted RP and answered questions he had about the <br />issue. <br />8/24/18 8/27/18 3 Inquiry <br />Dismissed: <br />Other <br />RP was unhappy with being given a park <br />warning and said she witnessed officers <br />breaking the door of a motorhome. <br />Dismissed: Other Review by Auditor found <br />allegation about the door to be false, and other parties with RP <br />admitted to the park violation. <br />8/27/18 10/5/18 38 Performance RP was unhappy with an interaction with <br />an officer when she called about a <br />trespasser. The officer was unconcerned <br />about her safety and showed obvious <br />disrespect for his own department. <br />Supervisor spoke with the officer about the interaction and <br />advised of more responsive ways to interact with citizens. <br />8/27/18 9/26/18 29 Performance RP was unhappy that officers did not cite <br />her boyfriend's ex with assault when she <br />threw a beer bottle at RP <br />Sgt. reviewed body cam of the incident and found that officers <br />conducted a complete and through investigation and found that <br />no one actually saw the bottle hit RP and RP had no marks <br />indicating that she had been struck. Due to no probable cause <br />officers did not cite or arrest. RP did not return phone calls to <br />speak about the findings. <br />8/28/18 9/19/18 21 Inquiry RP alleged officer kicked him in the ankle <br />to wake him up. <br />Review of video showed the officer tapped RP on the shoe to <br />wake RP who was dozing off in the booking room. No policy <br />violation noted. <br />8/27/18 9/5/18 8 Courtesy <br />Dismissed: <br />Other <br />RP was unhappy that officers forced him <br />to do a sobriety test when he had not <br />been drinking and had only taken some <br />medication and treated him unkindly. <br />Dismissed: Other Review of Body cam and <br />police reports by the Auditor found no policy violations. <br />June 19, 2019, Work Session – Item 2