Agenda Packet 7-15-19 Work Session

Home Browse Search

MovingAhead Investment Package Alternatives May 2019 Supplemental Refinement Report 29 23 range of investment level (Figure 2.11). The least built level of investment was in the 9-11 range of investment level (6%). Figure 2.11 Community Proposed Build-a-Packages by Level of Investment Source: JLA, 2019. 2.1.3.1 What Else Should the Team Know Participants were asked what more they wanted the project team to know as they refined the final investment package. Beyond the range of opposition or advocacy statements for specific outcomes on specific corridors, a deeper trend emerged: People asking for facts and data, most often about cost, to ensure community support for what they feel is necessary change. An example: Of course I want the best possible investment in our future and it looks like EmX offers the very best in safety, accessibility, and redevelopment. What I don't understand is how any of the long- term costs will be paid for. Please explain this to the economically clueless (people like me) so that we can get the most community support for this necessary evolution. In the final part of the survey, participants were asked what else they would like to tell the project team. Many responses were statements for or against public transit or the Lane Transit District in general, or EmX more specifically. Other submissions included an extensive, alternative view of climate-change science. 13% 6% 21% 31% 28% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 5-7 9-11 13-15 17-19 21-23 July 15, 2019, Joint Work Session – Item1