Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment G <br />Excerpt from the Budget Committee Responses to CIP Questions Memo dated February 1, 2007 <br />7. Barofsky CIP: How does public input work? Can there be additions to the CS-Finance <br />document and how? <br />The CIP development and review process is outlined on pages 8 and 9 of the FY08-13 Draft CIP. Citizen input <br />opportunities are available throughout the process. For the most part the CIP is a compilation of prior planning <br />processes. These prior processes offer the first opportunity for citizen input. For example, the FY07 Budget <br />Committee meetings received public testimony from citizens expressing a need to upgrade and improve the <br />safety of Golden Gardens Park. This input led to the inclusion of the Golden Gardens Acquisition and <br />Development project in the FY08-13 CIP. <br />Other citizen input opportunities include: <br />November 2006 Budget Subcommittee review of the CIP <br />December 2006 Planning Commission work session on the CIP <br /> Planning Commission CIP public hearing <br />February 2007 Budget Committee review of the CIP <br /> City Council public hearing on the CIP <br />Staff efforts aimed at increasing citizen involvement in the FY08-13 CIP include posting the Draft CIP on the <br />City’s webpage and sending neighborhood specific CIP articles to neighborhood newsletter editors. Both the <br />webpage and newsletter articles provide information on how citizens can give input into the CIP process. <br />9. Barofsky CIP: What are the concrete steps being taken to close the gap PW <br />between Park acquisition and development and operations and <br />maintenance? <br />Providing on-going funding for the maintenance of developed park facilities is a significant challenge. Given <br />the limitations on General Fund resources, Public Works pursues a number of strategies to close the gap. We <br />have been successful in receiving grants for such items as natural area restoration, trail restoration, and tree <br />inventory. We have developed partnerships with other organizations (Ex. Oregon Track Club for performing <br />maintenance on trails; REI for sponsoring riverbank clean-up events; the Friends of Hendricks Park for clean-up <br />and invasive species removals, Friends of Golden Gardens for clean-up and trail work). We have volunteer <br />programs like Stream Team, NeighborWoods, and Volunteer in Parks. We coordinate resources with other <br />agencies such as School District 4J and BLM for maintenance on abutting properties. While we are working to <br />leverage our resources wherever an opportunity presents itself, we recognize that providing for on-going park <br />maintenance funding will continue to be a challenge. <br />Bettman For simplicity, ongoing tracking, and cross referencing of projects CS-Finance <br />10.there should have an assigned and consistent reference number so a <br />citizen can find the same project under every category and track that <br />project form year to year. I thought the CIP subcommittee of the <br />budget committee asked for this. If not then let me officially ask if <br />staff can provide this, if so then same question? <br />The Budget Subcommittee recommendations listed on pages 10 and 11 of the Draft CIP do not specify adding a <br />unique project tracking reference. Currently, CIP and Multi-year Financial Plan projects do not have tracking <br />numbers. Once a project is put in the capital budget, it receives a capital project number. Adding a tracking <br />reference can be done with the realization that projects in the out years of the CIP may change or be combined <br />as plans are refined and CIP and MYFP tracking numbers may not have the same numbers as the budgeted <br />capital project. <br />