Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Step Three -- Project Valuation <br /> <br />Calculation of the improvement fee begins with a review of MWl\1C's adopted 20- Year <br />Project List to determine the value of future 'projects. Future projects are valued based on the <br />inflati<?nadjusted original cost estmate approach. Under this approach, the original <br />estimated cost of future projects is adjusted by the Engineering News-Record national2Ckity- <br />averageConstructi<?n Cost Index from the time of the original,es~te to estimate CWTent <br />values. The inflation adjusted original cost estimate approach recognizes inflation since the <br />original estimate. <br /> <br />Step Four - ProJect Cost Allocation <br /> <br />The project cost allocation methodology, for use in determining the improvement fee cost <br />basis, is a four-step allocation pro~ess consisting of the following steps: <br /> <br />1-1. Allocate project costs to facility process components (e.g., primary treatment, secondary <br />trea tInent). <br /> <br />1-2. Allocate costs by components to system capacity parameters (e.g., average flow, peak <br />'flow). <br /> <br />. 1-3. Allocate project costs to type (capacity improv'ement,performance upgrade, or <br />rehabilitation). ' <br /> <br />1-4. Allocate costs to user ty,pe (existing customers'orprojecte~ growth). <br />The project cost allocation methodology provides an equitable basis for determining th~ <br />projects or porti~1lS OfPIOjects that are related to growth capad;tyneeds and are, thereby, <br />included in the improvement fee portion of the SOC. calcUlation. The methodology is not <br />tied to a specific list of ,projects'.,intended to be fwrtded by SDCs (2Il.;.year project list), but is <br />intended to provide a consistentfram.~work for allocation of future projects to growth. <br /> <br />Each step of the methodology is described below. The gene~al allocation process is also <br />presented graphically in Figure 3. <br />