My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 02/20/07 Public Hearing
>
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:11 PM
Creation date
2/15/2007 8:30:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
182
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />STEPI-l .. ~ <br /> <br />, ' <br /> <br />/"( .. ;, yl i ~ ::" ~ ~ ") j ~ ~.. '^ ~ 0.: ; ~ ~ ~... "~.. ~ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Allocation Basis <br /> <br /> <br />O/o,'ofToW'l1Iwe <br />Lea' <br /> <br />fJ~Q <br /> <br />STEPI-2 .. ~ <br /> <br />STEPI-3 .. ~ <br /> <br />STEPI-4 .. ~ <br /> <br />FIGURE3-PROJECT COST ALLCOATION <br /> <br />The allocation of future projects to facility process components is generally fairly <br />straightforward, as most proJeots relate directly to an individual component or support the <br />entire treatment system. The refinement of the facility component allocation process for <br />M~C relates'to recognition of peak flow management costs. While it is likely that future <br />project lists will include projects entirely.related to peak flow management, it is also likely <br />that portions of projects relating to ,various aspects of the treatment process (e.g., secondary <br />~eatment) will also playa role in future peak flow,Ill.a!lagement. <br /> <br />The following question needs to be answered when allocating project costs' to facility <br />components: "Which specific facility component does the project expand or. improve?" If the <br />project expands or improves more than one facility component, then project costs should be <br />apportioned rel~ti.ve to the expansion or improvement of each applicable component. <br /> <br />The allocation fractions from Table 3 are used to distribute costs by facility compon~nt ,to <br />capacity parameter, as was done for the existing system cost allocations. The basis for these <br />allocations is described in Appendix B. <br /> <br />Step 1-3 of the project cost allocation methodology is to allocate costs to project types. The. <br />three project types, which are intended to be'representative of the complete project list, are: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.