My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 6: Ratification of IGR Minutes and Direction on Legislative Policy
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 04/09/07 Meeting
>
Item 6: Ratification of IGR Minutes and Direction on Legislative Policy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:54:41 PM
Creation date
4/6/2007 9:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/9/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2. Pending Legislation <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson said House Bill (HB) 2236 had been pulled on January 30 that would provide for the County to <br />pay out tax refunds prior to the end of the appeal period. She related that she had contacted the County staff <br />and they did not have an opinion one way or another, but expressed a willingness to discuss the bill with the <br />CCIGR. She noted that City staff had recommended a ‘Drop’ for the bill given that it had no bearing on the <br />City. She clarified that it was a Governor’s bill introduced by the Department of Revenue. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman indicated that she was satisfied with the explanation. <br /> <br />HB2468 <br />Ms. Medary said staff recommended ‘Priority 1 Support.’ She stated that the bill was consistent with what <br />the City was looking for as it lifted the urban growth boundary (UGB) regulations but maintained local land <br />use laws. <br /> <br />The CCIGR indicated unanimous support for staff’s recommendation. <br /> <br />Senate Bill (SB) 470 <br />Ms. Berrian explained that she had asked the State Department of Economic Development and City staff in <br />finance to find out whether or not there were any city services that were provided by the fund that would be <br />affected. She had not heard any opposition to the bill from the League of Oregon Cities (LOC). She said <br />the bill had come out of the advisory committee that she was a member of for the LOC and it was capped at <br />$1 million. She noted that the industry members were also supportive of the bill. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman indicated that the CCIGR approved of the staff recommendation of ‘Priority 2 Support.’ <br /> <br />HB2425 <br />Mr. Jones reviewed the bill, noting that it was currently parked in the House Judiciary. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if the bill was implementing the state law in Measure 39. Mr. Jones did not believe so. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman indicated that the CCIGR agreed with the staff recommendation of ‘Priority 3 Oppose.’ <br /> <br />HB2119 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to accept the recommendation of staff but to <br />change it to ‘Priority 3 Support’ with the amendment recommended by staff to include “state of <br />issuance” as one of the items that can not be obscured by a license plate frame or holder. The <br />motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB2138 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to change the stand on the bill to ‘Priority 3 Sup- <br />port.’ The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental February 13, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Relations <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.