Laserfiche WebLink
to the council that the board also understood that the land was in public domain and that the best and highest <br />value of the property included not only the economic return but also what was best for the community in <br />terms of opening up access to the river. Mr. Simpson said that he originally pushed to keep the EWEB <br />headquarters building in operation at its current site and sell just the industrial portion of the EWEB site; he <br />saw it naively in terms of the greatest dollar value. He said that over the last year he had come to <br />understand that the value included much more than that. He said that the council could trust the EWEB <br />commissioners to understand those values of balance. <br /> <br />Mr. Simpson said he had a constituent suggest that the City Hall might be located on the EWEB property. <br />He said that he would like to hear the council’s perspective on what might be the make-up of the Riverfront <br />Advisory Team. <br /> <br />Mr. Berggren said that this had been a learning experience for him and that he had become aware of the <br />approval role that the council would play in the process. He said that it had become very clear that there <br />would be no value for EWEB to spend money and go through a process if that process did not engage the <br />City’s interest in an authentic and diverse way. He repeated that there was no value in the board doing <br />something that would not lead to the council being able to approve the master plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Berggren spoke about the two bodies having the same constituency and the EWEB commissioners’ <br />awareness of the affect this process could have on rates. He used the metaphor of having money in the left <br />pocket and the right pocket, explaining that running out of money in one pocket to buy needed services could <br />impact a certain group of constituents, depending on who bore the cost. He said that while he and the board <br />understood and recognized the diversity of value, they would have trouble reconciling that diversity without <br />the process and the collaboration to find the balance point to treat both “pockets” in an equitable way. <br /> <br />Mr. Berggren said that it sounded to him as if the City’s interest in buying the property had become a <br />metaphor for controlling the process. He acknowledged that he could be wrong. He said that somehow the <br />option to purchase was a control fulcrum. He said that he thought that there were some trust issues to work <br />through but he assured the council that from the board’s perspective, there was no value for the board to do <br />something that was not trustworthy, artful, and complete in creating a master plan. Otherwise, the board <br />would have wasted a lot of time and money. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown thanked Mr. Berggren for his comments. He said that if the property was designated all open <br />space, EWEB’s rate payers would pay for the space; if it was not, the general tax payers would pay. He <br />said that someone was going to pay whether it was through property taxes or utility rates. He said that there <br />was a creative way similar to the Cottage Grove project. He said that through a collaborative process of the <br />minds in the community, a way could be found to maximize the value of the property and protect the <br />community asset. He said that he was not afraid of who did the process; but, whoever did it needed to have <br />a vested financial interest in it. He said that, otherwise the only motivation would be to make it a public <br />asset and the burden would be balanced on the backs of the rate payers. He said that would not be fair to <br />the rate payers, especially those who struggled to pay for basic needs. He said that everyone involved had to <br />make it work and that he was willing to participate to make it work. He said that he was still undecided as <br />to who should lead the process but emphasized that it had to work and that it would work. He thought that <br />it would be better to find resolution than fight. <br /> <br />Mr. Menegat said that he supported a collaborative process but, as a member of the board, he would be <br />reluctant to pass his duty or responsibility to proceed with this and to manage it on to someone else. He said <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 12, 2007 Page 13 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />