My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20299
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2003 No. 20274-20306
>
Ordinance No. 20299
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:44:50 PM
Creation date
8/2/2005 10:36:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
10/22/2003
Document_Number
20299
CMO_Effective_Date
11/21/2003
Repeal_Date
2/25/2005
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
system. EC 9.8680; 9.6505; 9.6870. A development that fails to meet this (or any other criterion ~t <br />KC 9.8650) must be denied. Through this Revi~TM process, the City will ensUre that a devetopmem s <br />impact on any transportation facility will be consistent with the functional classification ~or that <br />facility. <br /> <br /> d) W ould reduce the performance standards of the facilio; below the minimum acceptable <br /> eve/identified in TransPlan. <br /> <br />The proposed ordinance will not reduce the performance standards of any facility below the <br />mini~u~ aCceptable level identified in TransPlan. As detailed above, the Citb's code ;equires that <br />traffic impacts of any development proposal under this ordinance that wo(tld othe~ise have a <br />significant effbct on, transportation facility must be mitigated as part ofthe development s approval. <br />T~e City of Eugene s Tramc ~pact An~Iysis Review Process ensures that this ordinance ~loes not <br />mn afoul of OAR 660-012-0060. The City Code requir, es Traffic Impact Analysis Review whenever <br />an engineering analysis (the C~ty s or another engineer s) of a proposed development indicates that <br />apPrO¢al o£tl~ dev;lopment w;uld result in lev~Is of se~ice t~at ~ould fail to ~eet adopted level of <br />service standards. As discussed above, through this Review process, the City will ensure that a <br />development that is proposed under this ordin~ce will not reduce the performance standards of the <br />Pacilit~ below the mink~Um acceptable level identified in TransPlan. <br /> <br />As shown in the analysis provided above, the ordinance is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal <br /> 12. <br /> <br />Goal 73 - Conservation. To conserve energ3.,. <br /> <br />The amendments do not concern energy conservation. Therefore, Goal 13 does not apply. <br /> <br />Goal] anization. To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land <br />use. <br /> <br />The amendments do not affect the City's provisions regarding the transition of land from rural to <br />urban uses. Therefore, Goal 14 does not apply. <br /> <br />Goat i5 - Willamette River Greenwa~ To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural, <br />-scenic, historical, agriculturaL~ economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette <br />River as the Willamette River Greenway. <br /> <br /> The amendments to not contain any changes that affect the regulation of areas within the Willamette <br /> River Greenway. Therefore, Goal 15 does not apply. <br /> <br /> Goals ]6- ]9. Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes, and Ocean resources. <br /> These Statewide Plamaing Goals do not apply to the actions taken. <br /> <br /> (2) The amendment is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan and <br /> <br />Exhibit A- 15 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.