Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Community policing in Eugene has struggled due to lack of a coordinated vision and insufficient <br />resources for the level of service desired. At the core of community policing are two elements: (1) <br />establishment of relationships between police officers and the neighborhoods in which they work, and <br />(2) sufficient patrol officer time to engage in jointly prioritized problem-related proactive activities to <br />improve neighborhood quality of life. <br /> <br />Eugene is a city relatively low in violent crime but one relatively high in property crime, particularly <br />theft. Because a city’s overall crime rate is heavily weighted toward property crime statistics, a high <br />property crime rate gives Eugene the appearance of being an unsafe place to live. Apart from <br />appearances, the effects of a high rate of property crime are evident and most residents and many <br />visitors experience associated feelings of vulnerability and increased costs to protect, insure and replace <br />property. While the department must play its own important role, a comprehensive interagency <br />community strategy led by the EPD is required to address this issue. <br /> <br />The Police Initiative is linked to several community and regional public safety issues. In addition, the <br />material provided in the Magellan Report will require analysis and thoughtful review. As a starting <br />point the following actions emerge as important steps or milestones in the Police Initiative: <br /> <br />1) Review and consider the Magellan Research Corporation’s report: “Comprehensive Staffing <br />Needs Projection, Eugene Police Department Final Report.” To effectively use the Magellan <br />Report and the Model for the Allocation of Patrol Personnel (MAPP) model, its underlying <br />assumptions must be rigorously analyzed and understood. There are a number of policy-related <br />decisions that will be required (see Item 4, following) based on this understanding. <br /> <br />2) Assess the Lane County budget and program issues as they relate to Eugene’s goals for a safe <br />community. With the failure of the County’s proposed income tax measure and still uncertain <br />revenue picture for FY08, assumptions and inputs into the Magellan model must consider these <br />implications for the City of Eugene, the Police Department and the prioritization of public safety <br />services to be provided to the community. <br /> <br />3) Discuss the implications of the staffing models in the Comprehensive Staffing Needs Projection <br />Final Report with University of Oregon officials. A number of issues are raised relative to the <br />university and its contractual relationship with the City of Eugene. Although these conversations <br />have started, there are significant staffing and public safety implications associated with them <br />that must be incorporated into the MAPP model and staffing plan. <br /> <br />4) Using information from action items 1-3 above, as well as prioritization information anticipated <br />from the City’s level and mix of services discussion in advance of the FY09 Budget process, <br />define policy level decisions that must be made as inputs into the MAPP model and bring these <br />decisions back to the Mayor and City Council for action. <br /> <br />5) Utilize policy decisions to create the staffing plan, balancing Eugene’s public safety staffing <br />needs for the next five – seven years with various implementation strategies, consistent with the <br />budgetary capacity of the City and the service level and mix identified in the course of preparing <br />development of the FY09 budget. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070529\S070529C.doc <br />