My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20305
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2003 No. 20274-20306
>
Ordinance No. 20305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:44:53 PM
Creation date
8/2/2005 11:28:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
12/3/2003
Document_Number
20305
CMO_Effective_Date
1/2/2004
Author
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
process ensures that this ordinance does not run afbul of OAR 660-012-0060. The City Code <br />requires Traffic Impact Analysis Review whenever a proposed development will generate 100 or <br />more vehicle trips during any peak hour using the most recent edition of the institute of <br />Transportation Engineer's Trip__ Generation Manual. EC 9.8670(1). if such a use is proposed fbr <br />construction~ it is required to go hrough the City s Type II or Type III Traffic Impact Analysis <br />Review. Traffic Impact Analysis Review is also required for any development that will result in an <br />increase in traffic that will contribute to traffic pro,blems (based on cun'ent accident rates, traffic <br />volumes or speeds that warrant action under the City s traffic calming program), or that wilt result in <br />traffic in areas where the City has docun;tented pedestrian and/or bicycle safety concerns. As <br />discussed 'under (d), below, the City also requires a Traffic Impact Analysis Review if an engineering <br />analysis (the City's or another engineer's) indicates that approval of the development would result in <br />levels of service that would fail to meet adopted level of service standards. <br /> <br />Among other things, the Review requires that the development meet the purposes set out at 9.86507 <br />including the provision of facilities necessary to accommodate the traffic impact of the proposed <br />development through the use of traffic control devices and public or private improvements. EC <br />9.8650; 9.8680. This means that the development must include mitigation measures so that it does <br />not have a "significant impact on a transportation facility." The Review requires that a proposed <br />development must design and construct its traffic improvements to meet the City's standards, <br />including required right~of-way and paving widths according to the street's fhl~Cfional classification <br />system. EC 9.8680; 9~6505; 9.6870. A development that fails to meet this (or any other criterion a~ <br />EC 9.8650) must be denied. Through this Review process, the City will ensure that a development's <br />impact on any transportation facility will be consistent with the functional classification for that <br />facility. <br /> <br />(d) kIZoutd reduce the performance standards ef the facility below the minimum acceptable <br />level ident~ed i~ TransPlan. <br /> <br />The proposed ordinance will not reduce the performance standards of any facility below the <br />minimum acceptable level identified in TransPlan. <br /> <br />Further, as described above, the City's code requires that traffic impacts of any development <br />proposal under this ordinance that would otherwise have a significant effect on transportation facility <br />must be mitigated as part of the development's approval. The City of Eugene's Traffic Impact <br />Analysis Review process ensures that this ordinance does not run afoul of OAR 660-012-0060. The <br />City' Code requires Traffic Impact Analysis Review whenever an engineering analysis (the City's or <br />another engineer's) of a proposed development indicates that approval of the development would <br />result in levels of service that would fail to meet adopted level of service standards. As discussed <br />above~ through this Review process, the City- will ensure that a development that is proposed-under <br />this ordinance will not reduce the performance standards of the facility below the minimum <br />acceptable level identified in TransPlan. <br /> <br />As shown in the analysis provided above, the ordinance is consistent with Statewide Plam~ing <br />Goal 12~ <br /> <br />Exhibit A - Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.