Resolution No. 5303 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Eugene -Springfield Area Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan 5. Annexes An example of this would be a publicly owned utility, with its own governing board, serving half of a county. This utility fits the definition of a "special district" outlined within the Stafford Act. Since the service area is much larger than a single city, however, their request would be declined. This is due to the fact they do not share the same hazards or planning area as the base plan. It would be recommended for this special district to either develop their own NHMP or partner on the county's NHMP. If this was a real example, the Project Manager would offer information and guidance on the best way to pursue this course of action. 5.4 Terminating Sub -Plan Holder Partnerships The eligibility afforded under this process to official NHMP Sub -Plan Holders can be terminated in two ways. First, a Sub -Plan Holder can request to be removed from the plan. This may be done because the Sub -Plan Holder has decided to develop its own plan, identified another NHMP better suited to its needs, or they no longer wish to take part in the programs for which an approved and current plan makes them eligible. A Sub -Plan Holder wishing to voluntarily leave the plan shall inform the NHMP Project Manager of this request in writing. This notification can occur at anytime during the course of the planning cycle. A Sub -Plan Holder wishing to purse this course of action is advised to make sure they are eligible under a new planning effort to avoid any period of noncompliance under the DMA. Upon notification of this intent the Project Manager will immediately notify both the Oregon Office of Emergency Management (OEM) and FEMA in writing of the Sub - Plan Holder's desire to no longer be a part the planning effort, and the eligibility afforded to the Sub -Plan Holder should be rescinded upon the plan's expiration. The second way a Sub -Plan Holder may terminate their partnership with this plan is by failing to meet the expectations for a NHMP Sub -Plan Holder (see Section A.2). Each Sub -Plan Holder agreed to these terms upon adopting the plan. The Project Manager and Project Team will monitor a Sub -Plan Holder's eligibility status. The determination of whether a partner is following the expectations of a Sub - Plan Holder will be based on the following factors: • Is the Sub -Plan Holder providing current POC information to the NHMP Project Manager in a timely manner? • Is the Sub -Plan Holder supporting the NHMP Update Committee by attending the required number of meetings? • Is the Sub -Plan Holder completing and maintaining an approvable annex? • Is the Sub -Plan Holder making a reasonable effort to complete mitigation action items? 5-4 January 2020