My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 4: Res/November Election
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 08/08/05 Mtg
>
Item 4: Res/November Election
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:46:37 PM
Creation date
8/3/2005 3:44:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/8/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT C <br /> ~ City Manager's Office <br /> City of Eugene <br />May 17, 2005 777 Pearl Street, Room 105 <br /> Eugene, Oregon 97401-2793 <br /> (541) 682-5010 <br />Commissioner Tim Laue, Chair (541) 682-5414 Fax <br /> (541) 682-5045 TTY <br />Police Commission www. ci.eugene.or, us <br />Eugene Police Department <br />777 Pearl Street, Room 106 <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br /> <br />Dear Tim: <br /> <br />I want to thank you and Commissioner Angle Sifuentez for meeting with Chief Lehner and me <br />last week to review the evolving work of the Police Commission on possible approaches to <br />external review of complaints regarding the Eugene Police Department. I am impressed by the <br />commission's work to-date on these important concepts. I also appreciate the opportunity to <br />share my thoughts on what might be a workable model for the.City of Eugene. By way of this <br />letter, I recommend the following ideas to the Police Commission for consideration as possible <br />approaches to improving our investigation and review processes. <br /> <br />The 'proposed complaint investigation and review process should be based upon several <br />underlying principles: <br /> <br />· The review process should ensure that investigations of community complaints are conducted <br /> in an appropriate, competent, and thorough manner. Investigations should also be conducted <br /> in such a manner that they ensure fairness to both the complainant and the Eugene Police <br /> Department (EPD) employee, as well as protect the procedural and substantive due process <br /> rights of the EPD employee. <br /> <br />· The review process should provide community members with opportunities to review how the <br /> City is investigating and responding to complaints. It should also allow opportunities for <br /> people to provide the City with suggestions on how to improve the investigation process. <br /> <br />· The review process should not discourage complainants from filing legitimate complaints, and <br /> it should ensure that complainants feel their complaints have been appropriately investigated. <br /> Complainants should also feel they have been adequately involved in, and informed of, the <br /> investigation process. <br /> <br />· The review process should work within the existing City Charter structure so that additional <br /> expenses and bureaucratic layers are not unnecessarily created. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.