My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ord. 20640
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2020 No. 20625 - 20644
>
Ord. 20640
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2020 11:45:35 AM
Creation date
10/22/2020 11:43:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Ordinances
Document_Date
10/12/2020
Document_Number
20640
CMO_Effective_Date
11/20/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
669
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES <br /> DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES <br />With an ultimate land use pattern vision in place, alternatives brought forward throughout this process <br />should work toward incrementally and strategically achieving that ultimate vision. Analysis began with <br />airfield alternatives, the primary leading element, and moved into the passenger terminal building as the <br />secondary leading element, followed by the terminal apron system, the landside/roadway system, and <br />aviation support facilities, all of which are trailing elements. <br /> Airfield Design <br />The airfield is the leading element in airport planning as it is highly dictated by terrain, predominant wind <br />patterns, and the aircraft fleet mix which it serves. Additionally, airfield design is guided by defined FAA <br />standards, guidance, and best practices which support its role as the primary leading planning element. <br />The Eugene Airport runways are well designed to service the unique mix of aircraft which use them and <br />are the driving factor for designing the supporting taxiway configuration. The following sections briefly <br />review key issues for the airfield system, propose a conceptual solution to meet current/future needs <br />based on FAA design standards and industry best practices, and analyze each option against established <br />evaluation criteria. <br />4.5.1.1 Key Issues and Items for Consideration <br />The facility requirements analysis identified airfield facilities which were deficient in meeting PAL 3 <br />demand. The following airfield facilities require the development of alternative concepts: <br />» Runways <br /> Runway system, as it exists, meets the needs over the planning period <br /> RPZ intrusions to Runway 16L and 16R require resolution to meet FAA guidance <br />» Taxiways <br /> Major improvements are needed to simplify the airport taxiway system to improve pilot <br />orientation, bring it up to modern FAA design standards, eliminate unnecessary <br />maintenance-intensive pavements, and address inefficient locations for taxiway <br />connections to Runway 16R-34L <br />» Hotspot at Taxiway A-A8-A9 <br /> A8 bypass taxiway connector slated for removal (Summer 2017) <br />The most critical leading element for the airfield is the runway system. The runway system at Eugene <br />Airport is a parallel configuration separated by 4,300 feet allowing enough capacity for aircraft operations <br />beyond the planning period forecast activity levels. Facility requirements analysis supported preserving <br />and maintaining both runways to their current design standards without a need for extensions over the <br />planning period, however, land at each runway end should continue to be held for extensions which may <br />be required beyond this planning period. The two runways at EUG have predominantly distinctive user <br />groups; wherein, the east runway is largely used by general aviation pilots and the west runway is the <br />primary runway for commercial carriers. Hangar development over the last decade has been generally <br />located near the runway that best serves the users of the new hangar. The adjacencies of users to these <br />runways must be considered when developing and analyzing alternatives. Alternative options are also <br />presented to address the RPZ impacts at the Runways 16R and 16L ends. <br />EUGENE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 4-12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.