Laserfiche WebLink
Findings and Recommenditons Job #32 t S <br />July tZ, t995 <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />Hearings Official received a July 6,1995 Memorandum from the City Engineer outlining the above <br />~nformat~on. <br />Based upon the available information, it is the finding of the Hearings C~f~cial that this project has <br />been ~tiated, bid and constructed. m accordance with the provisions of the Eugene Code. It is the <br />further finding of the Hearings Qf~cial that the final improvement costs are lower or equal to those <br />quoted at the local improvement hearing and are comparable to most projects of this type. <br />Finally, the Hearings Qf~icial finds that the proposed assessments are calculated in accordance with <br />the Eugene Code and that the project is one for which the assessments are for a local improvement <br />as set forth in QRS 310.14a because: <br />(1) The assessments do not exceed actual costs; <br />(2) The assessments are imposed for a Capital Improvement Construction Project <br />which provides a specific benefit to a specific property or rectifies the problem <br />caused by a specific property; <br />(3) The assessments are imposed in a single assessment upon completion of the project; <br />and <br />(4) The assessments allow the property owners to elect to pay off with interest over at <br />least ten (10) years. <br />Therefore, the Hearings Qf~cial recommends that the City Council adapt an ordinance for the <br />assessment as set forth by the City Engineer. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Gar . Darnielle <br />H ring Officlal <br />