Ordinance No. 20055 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ca acity of surrounding streets and alleys; and to other p relative impacts of the development. ~~~. This criterion -has consistently been interpreted and is here inte reted to address off--site impacts of the proposed use. The tibilit set forth by this criterion standard of reasonable compa y is construed to contemp~.ate that a use will have some ~.evel of ' m act on abuttin roperties and the surrounding neighborhood but ~. p g p the level of im acts must be minimal relative to the reasonable p e ectation of accu iers of nearby properties given the zoning and ~ p the character of the area, including the specifically allowed uses in the anent zoning districts and activ~,ty that wi~.l normally p occur in an area so developed and zoned. The term "minimal Impact" also reco nines that there will be same impact of uses but ,that the g i~a act should be the smallest possible if such a use , is to be p allowed with the practical level of operation as a functional use. The term "livab flit " is construed to mean the expectation, of+a y erson reasonably has for healthy safety and general well-being in p the context of existin development, the character of an area and g o siderin the normal level of activity for the area and c n g to the area. The issue of applicable land use laws perta~.ning , 'vabilit ertains not only to residential uses that might be 11 y p use of surraundin sues affected but livability far persons mak~.ng g in their employment or other activities. 'ta ro riate development" as it pertains to abutting The term pp p ro ernes and surrounding neighborhood means the future p p evelo meat of those uses allowed in the zoning districts of the d p , roundin ro ernes and uses an surrounding properties intended sun g p p o ernes as contemplated to be encouraged on these surrounding pr p by adopted policy documents. "surroundin nei hborhood" as used in the criterion is The term g g ' reted in the context of the nature of the proposed use and interp the character of an area. In this instance, that term ,ls ' to reted tv mean a radius of one city black around the city a.n rp is to be located. black upon which the transit center ' 9.72 a re ices consideration of the location, size, Section ~ } ~ esi n and o eratin characteristics of the proposed development, d g, - p g on scale bulk The size of the proposed facility, considering harm y, r ' overa e will be reasonably compatible with and have minimal and c g evelo anent of the impact on the livability and the appropriate d p f ttin ro erties and the surrounding neighborhood, The facility abu g p p , e f will be a roximately two stories in height, well be its 1 pp e a ed after site review pertaining to its design relative to dev 1 p 'n terms of these the historic structures in the area. The use, i acteristics is considerably less than could be developed under char , e C-3 district. There is no height limitation In the C--3 th ' t no front and setback requirement except ,solar dlstric y er the condlt~ons requirements and no side yard setbacks. Und 10 - FINDINGS OF HEARINGS OFFICIAL (CU 94-3)