My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCAgenda-4/12/04Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-04/12/04Mtg
>
CCAgenda-4/12/04Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:14:02 PM
Creation date
4/9/2004 2:29:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/12/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
351
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
by the University which lay between the limited high-density residential/limited institutional use area and <br />the surrounding neighborhood. He related that the Fairmount Neighbors had come to appreciate the <br />City's concerns regarding the abolition of conditional use permits (CUPs) for the area and had approved <br />the change, with one exception. He explained that the neighborhood group wished to clearly state that <br />the intent of the limit on CLIPs was to not allow for large-scale conditional uses with lot consolidation. <br />He conveyed the committee's suggestion that a new criterion, policy 6 (g), be added stating, as follows: <br /> "Conditional uses shall not exceed a total area of 35,000 square feet within the entire <br /> University-owned low-density area." <br /> Mr. Taylor stated that 35,000 square feet was the total square footage of seven standard housing lots. He <br /> noted the committee was open to other language that would achieve the same intent. <br /> <br />Daniel Klute, 2021 Villard Street, supported the amendments before the council at the present meeting. <br />He thanked all who participated in the process and asked the council to show appreciation for the <br />collaborative process by funding the two traffic studies. <br /> <br />Art Farley, 1667 Fairmount Boulevard, supported the Planning Commission recommendation on this <br />issue. He affirmed that all major issues between the University and the neighborhood had been resolved. <br />He reiterated the necessity of funding the two proposals for funding the traffic studies and potential <br />solutions. He averred there were Metro Plan policies that spoke to protection of existing neighborhoods <br />from impacts of changes in density. He felt the traffic measures were necessary to make the overall <br />amendment package consistent with the plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Farley agreed this was a major land use change within the core. He cited other major land use <br />changes and how much money the council had committed to those and asked the City Council to consider <br />how much less the traffic studies would cost. He asserted it was time for the City to participate as a <br />partner in this redevelopment by providing the funding. <br /> <br />David Wade, 1673 Villard Street, echoed Mr. Farley's comments. He called the University of Oregon <br />the "economic engine" of Eugene as it brought 20,000 students into the area every school year. He <br />opined that the City was indifferent to the University and took it for granted. He noted the State's <br />defunding of higher education and said it was no longer "a guaranteed thing." He urged the City to step <br />up and help. He stressed that the neighborhood and University had cooperated, but that the agreement <br />was contingent upon the City's funding of the traffic study and traffic calming. He urged the City to <br />provide the funding. <br /> <br />Rich Linton, 1283 University of Oregon, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies, stressed the <br />University's need for space as, at 20,000 students, the campus was experiencing record enrollment. He <br />said the planned development would allow the University to meet its needs for space. He stated that the <br />University was receiving more money for research, but did not have housing for such research. He <br />related that the University saw, within the East Campus Area, 275,000 gross square feet that could be <br />located there and, as the University grew, an additional 325,000 gross square feet could be located there. <br />He felt it critical that the East Campus Plan be put into place so that the University of Oregon could <br />continue to plan for its future needs and ensure a strong and vital University for years to come. <br /> <br />Chris Ramey, 1276 University of Oregon, Director of Facilities Planning of the University of Oregon, <br />stated that the land use application before the council had been arrived at through an 18-month process. <br />He noted the University had planned for East Campus development for a much longer time and the <br />University owned all of the lots in the area except for eight. Mr. Ramey lauded the comprehensive <br />collaborative process that had transpired between the University, neighborhood group, and City. He <br />thanked the neighbors for taking the time to help and declared it had resulted in improvements to the <br />plan. <br /> <br />MINUTES- February 23, 2004 Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.