My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20056
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 20056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:48:45 PM
Creation date
1/8/2009 2:23:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20056
Document_Title
Concerning local streets & public improvements; amending sections 6.300,6.305,7.010,7085,7.140,7.290,7.640,7.650,9.015,9.030,9.033,9.035,9.040,9.045,9.050,9.055,9.060,9.075,9.085,9.510,9.512,9.386,9.574,9.688,& 9.702 of the EC; adding new 7.280 to EC
Adopted_Date
8/5/1996
Approved Date
8/5/1996
CMO_Effective_Date
9/5/1996
Signer
Ruth F. Bascom
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EUGENE <br />INTER-DEPARI'MENTAI, MEMORANDI7M <br />CITY ATTORNEY - CIVII, DEPARTMENT <br />To: date ]~ieland <br />Dade: Aug~t 1, ~9~7 <br />Deputy City ~eeorder <br />S~bjert: subsection 9,~12~~~a~ of the ~u ene o <br />g G de,197~ <br />A pity hearings ~~cial has questioned whether Subsection 9.SI~ <br />Cod ~6~~a} of the Eugene <br />e, 197 as rt cuixen~y appears in the Cvde ~~ correct, He fndieated to e <br />T resa Bishow of the <br />Planning Depaent that it differed frQ.~ a raor version avails a to " <br />P bl lum and requested that she <br />detern„~e if the Cvur~cxl had intentionally amended it, and when. T <br />cress con~cted our o f f ice fvr <br />assistance. <br />we have reviewed all the or~Ces amend~g 5ectivn 9 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ The my ' <br />st recent vrdxr~ances <br />in which Su~bsec~on ~~}~a~ appears are ~rdiuance 1~77U ~.dv red ' <br />P April 22, ~ 99 ~ , and qrd i~nance <br />~ODS~ adopted August 5, ~99~. ~n Qrdinance ~977D Subsectio <br />n ~~}~a~ reads. <br />"~a~ The proposed deve~ap~e~t is consistent with related . . <br />pol~ctes and <br />deveioptnent standards in applicable, ado red nei boyhood r <br />p gh ef~nement ply and <br />special area s~dies." <br />In. Ordinance ~005~, the current ~ersipn in the Cvde it yea <br />~, d~. <br />"~a~ The proposed development is consistent wig related ' ' <br />policies aid <br />development standards} if applicable, ado red refinement ' <br />. p p ana and special area <br />st~dtes, ?' <br />we reviewed ~e legislature draft of Ordinance ~OD56 and the v <br />my ~tztended xe'~iszon to <br />that subsection was the deletion of the word "nei hborhaod. ~ . <br />g The leg~slatave draft did not show <br />~.e addition ^f the contnria after `standards, " or a cha a from ~' ~ ~' ,, . <br />ng ~n tv if , we belzeve those <br />changes to be scrivener s errors. P~rsnant to Section 27 of the ' <br />~;~dfnance please consider this <br />au~,o~adon and a request tQ admiaustra~vety correct Subsection 9.5 <br />~~t~~~a} of the Eugene Code, <br />~ 97 ~ tv read as retlected in the first sub axa a h a se <br />~~ ~ P ~' p ~ ~ t forth above, with the word <br />neighbarhoad deleted to reflect rho amen,d~nent intended b ~Drdi a ce <br />y n n 2~~5b, <br />A cop~r of th%s rnetno should be appended to flrd%nance 20456 to reflect e - . . <br />acti - th a~.strattve <br />on taken, as au~orized by Section 27 of the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.