Resolution No. 4632 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(c) Involvement of neighbors and collaboration between neighbors and other civil groups, not-for-profits, government agencies, etc.; 4.3.2 The period of time over which the project will provide a continuing benefit; 4.3.3 If the proposal is for a physical improvement, including landscaping, whether the proposal has provided for ongoing maintenance; 4.3.4 For events, the extent to which long term benefits extending beyond the episode have been described; 4.3.5 Whether the proposed project is compatible with existing plans; 4.3.6 Whether the project proposal reflects the agreement of a majority of the affected neighbors; 4.3.7 The special needs of the neighborhood for which the project is proposed; 4.3.8 The completeness of the application and the extent to which it demonstrates: (a) That the project is clearly defined, and feasible; (b) That the budget for the project is based on reasonable and verifiable costs and specifications; and (c) That the project will be managed by capable operational and fiscal managers; 4.3.9 The extent to which the matching portion of the grant, including the availability of volunteered labor and materials, is well documented and credible; and 4.3.10 Whether more than 50% of the project costs are covered by the match; 4.3.11 The desirability of more evenly distributing grant awards throughout the community. 5. Selection Process. The Committee will review each application and each member shall rate the application according to the criteria set forth in the RFP. The RFP shall describe the rating process in a manner calculated to advise applicants how their proposals will be ranked. For Standards and Guidelines - 3