Ordinance No. 20132 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

truck berths, the average daily trips transferred will be 27 trips per day ~6~' Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual estimates 6.79 trips per berth per day for truck terminals}. Lane County Transportation staff conducted a traff c count at the GreenhilllAirport road intersection, which is currently controlled by stop signs on all approaches. They found that the intersection did not meet warrants for signals. Peak hour analysis shows level-of-service "A" for all movements through the intersection. In reference to the proposed air cargo expansion, County staff concludes that, "given the minor increase in truck volumes estimated far this proposal,l would not expect an appreciable impact onlevel-of service" ~e-mail correspondence from Tom Stinchfield dated March 19,1998}. Limitations in Use. The original request for a Metro Plan amendment has initiated in December 1997} affected over 28 acres of land and allowed approximately 10 acres of undetermined future uses. This proposal has been reduced to only the air cargo facility on only 9.1 acres, and a concurrent Airport Master Plan amendment is included to designate the 9.1 acres as Air Cargo on the On Airport Land Use Plan. This limitation of use makes the proposed amendment consistent with DAR 660-012-0060 1 }~a}. Can ormance with Adop ,,,,.' „ ted Plans. The adopted transportation plan for the metropolitan area is TransPlan. It includes no specific recommendations in the vicinity of this proposed amendment. The Airport Master Plan recommends access improvements to reduce interruptions in traffic flow, separate general aviation traffic, and facilitate increases in parking lot capacity as general improvements to accommodate the overall growth of the airport. The Airport Master Plan concluded that both the Clear LakelGreenhill and Airport Road access networks provide adequate capacity to accommodate forecast demand" Appendix A, pages 1 and 2, of Airport Master Plan,1990}. The proposed amendment to the Metro Plan diagram would not result in a significant traff c impact pursuant to OAR 660-012-00602} as it would not result in a change to the functional classification of the existing or planned transportation facility; change standards implementing a functional classification system; allow types or levels of land uses which would result in levels of travel or access which are inconsistent with the functional classification of a transportation facility; or reduce the level of service of the facility below the minimum acceptable level identified in the TSP. Findin s for DAR 660-012-0065. The Transportation Rule determined that certain transportation activities and facilities in rural areas are consistent with other Goals. This proposal is found consistent with and does not require an exception from Statewide Planning Goals 3, 4,11, and 14 pursuant to DAR 660-012-065~I}and 660-012-0653}fin}, which state, 660-012-065 ~ 1 }. 'his rune identi ies transportation facilities, services and improvements which may ~e permitted on rural Exhibit C, Findings ~ 11