Ordinance No. 20151 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Hearing Memo -Barger Drive March 1,199 Page 2 PROJECT For the Barger Drive portion of the prof ect, the improvements included completing the south half of the roadway from Terry Street to the just west of Ghio Street and then a full 46-foot width X12-foot travel lanes, a 12-foot center lane and two 5-foot bike lanes} with curbs and gutters, from that point to Greenhill Road. In addition, wastewater and storm drain systems, street lights, street trees, a signalized pedestrian crossing, and continuous sidewalk on the south side of Barger Drive were included in this portion of the proj ect. Properties adj scent to the previously fully improved north section from Terry Street to just west of Dhio street are not being assessed. Properties autside the City boundaries were not assessed at this time for storm or wastewater improvements, however, the cost per square foot calculation for each system included an assessable area for those properties. when these properties wish to connect to these systems they will be charged an "equivalent assessment". Additionally, at the time of the LID was formed Lane County had approved in concept the idea of providing funds to defer road assessments for large lots outside the City limits. At this time no funding is available, all lots are fully assessed for road improvements. The construction of Legacy Street south of Barger includes a 46-foot improvement width X12-foot travel lanes, a 12-foot center lane and two 5-foot bike lanes} with curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street lights, street trees, wastewater and storm drainage systems. In addition, a wastewater pressure main was constructed extending from a new pump station at the southwest corner of the Bethel School site~~under a separate contract} ,north along Legacy Street to Barger, east along Barger Drive to Terry Street and .then north along Terry Street to an existing force main near the A-2 Channel. Since the force main~is not be available for direct connection, this portion of the project was not assessable. Finally, a wastewater collection system was extended along the south, east and north boundaries of the Bethel Schools site and adjacent properties that will be served by that system. are included in the wastewater assessment calculation. ASSESSMENT The final project costs are lower than the costs used to calculate the estimated assessment units cost per foot, cost per square foot} at the dime of the formation of the LID. Estimated casts included 10°/a contingency and engineering, inspection and administration fees based on a percentage of the construction costs. After the formation of the LID some changes were made to the design to lower construction costs. Very little of the contingency was used. Actual engineering and inspection fees were included in the f nal assessment and were substantially lower than the estimated. The assessable cost listed at the time of the formation of the LID did not include the stormwater and wastewater charges that will be collected later as an "equivalent assessment". Those casts were included in the city costs. The f nal assessable costs listed below do include the "equivalent assessment" costs.