My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 12/14/05 WS
>
Item A: City Council Priority Issue - City Hall Complex
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:00:20 PM
Creation date
12/7/2005 10:08:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/14/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Memorandum <br />Eugene City Hall Master Plan <br />December 5, 2005 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />Site Options Study <br />Establish comprehensive site evaluation criteria. Work with staff and Council to identify potential <br />development sites (including land acquisition and swaps); evaluate all considered sites with site <br />evaluation matrix. Identify approximately three sites for detailed analysis (compatibility with program, <br />adjacent uses, pedestrian and vehicular access, topography, sub-surface conditions, future growth, <br />solar access, views, traffic impact, etc.). Facilitate decision about most appropriate site/so <br /> <br />At the completion of the Analysis Phase, a 5-1/2 month Conceptual Design Phase would then lead to an agreed <br />design direction. <br /> <br />Concept Options <br />Explore concept options on preferred site/so Illustrate and present options to staff and Council; identify <br />preferred options. Develop preferred options (three maximum), review with staff and Council, and <br />perform concept cost models (three maximum). Refine preferred options, review with staff and <br />Council, and refine concept cost models. Prepare summary report. <br /> <br />Workshops/Meetings/Public Process <br />Throughout this 11-month effort, (4) two-hour Council Workshops and (4) 45-minute Council Work <br />sessions would occur. During that same period, an extensive Public Involvement process consisting of <br />citizen interviews, neighborhood, electronic and media outreach and (4) Community forums will also <br />take place. <br /> <br />This represents an approach in which multiple technical studies would occur in a linear process allowing the <br />City Council to make highly informed decisions. <br /> <br />Approach B- Less Comprehensive Basic Services <br />The most significant differences between Approach A outlined above and Approach B is that a complete Space <br />Needs Study would not initially occur, the Police Service Delivery Study would be eliminated and some Phase II <br />Public Process milestones would be moved to Phase III. The overall schedule for Phase II would also be <br />shortened from 11 months to seven (7) months and divided into two phases. The first two (2) months would <br />be an Analysis Phase consisting of the following tasks: <br /> <br />Cursory Review of Existing Conditions <br />In lieu of detailed review of existing conditions described above, this effort would consist of a one-day <br />tour of existing facilities. Working base plans of existing City Hall would also be developed. <br /> <br />Program Outline <br />In lieu of a full Space Needs Study, a Program "Outline" would be developed allowing the design team <br />to estimate an approximate area (GSF) requirement for the new facility. It would, however, establish <br />major departmental adjacencies, access, security relationships and parking/C ity-owned vehicle <br />requirements. No detailed program or equipment lay-outs, inter-department adjacencies or narrative <br />descriptions would be provided. <br /> <br />Simplified Concept Options <br />A simplified version of Approach A described above. The major difference is a reduced level of <br />consultant input in development of concept options. Concept options on preferred site/s would be <br />explored. Options would be Illustrated and presented to staff and Council; preferred options would be <br />identified. Preferred options (three maximum) would be developed, reviewed with staff and Council, <br />and concept cost models (three maximum) would be performed. Preferred options would be refined, <br />reviewed with staff and Council, and concept cost models would be refined. Summary Report <br />prepared. <br /> <br />733 SW OAK STREET, PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 TELEPHONE 503.227.1254 FAX 503.227.7818 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.