My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2C: Ratification of IGR Committee Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 02/09/09 Meeting
>
Item 2C: Ratification of IGR Committee Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:33:55 PM
Creation date
2/6/2009 12:06:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8. Polygraph Tests for Public Safety Officer Hiring <br />In relating the legislative concepts to the Governor’s budget, Ms. Wilson expressed that the Governor’s <br />significant budget cuts related to corrections, human services and other entities dictated that any legislative <br />concepts supported by the CCIGR would need to be revenue neutral and employ strategic partnerships with <br />private and public agencies. <br />Elimination of PSCC (Repeal of SB1145) <br />Ms. Wilson commented that the repeal of Senate Bill 1145 would eliminate the Public Safety Coordinating <br />Committees (PSCC) created in 1994. <br />Ms. Wilson, in response to a question from Ms. Ortiz, noted that PSCC’s historically had provided <br />resources and funding for certain public safety concerns such as corrections and rehabilitation. <br />Ms. Wilson noted that certain Oregon communities such as Linn County had opted out of Senate Bill 1145. <br />Ms. Taylor expressed that the PSCC’s efforts in Lane County had been a ridiculous waste of time and <br />money. Ms. Wilson noted that it appeared that several community members shared that sentiment. <br />Ms. Wilson noted that she had pulled a significant amount of background research regarding SB1145 and <br />could return with further information for the Committee if that was their direction. <br />Ms. Wilson reported that at one time Lane County had considered opting out of SB1145 back in 2002 but <br />had decided against it as doing so would have meant that the county would have to pay back a portion of <br />SB1145 funds that had been used to build the Lane County Corrections facility. <br />Mr. Poling commented that it would be important to solicit input from the City of Springfield and Lane <br />County before proceeding further. Ms. Ortiz agreed with Mr. Poling’s statement. <br />Ms. Wilson commented that the PSCC was made up of representatives from throughout Lane County and <br />the surrounding areas. <br />Ms. Taylor noted that the notion of a PSCC was not well-supported at a recent joint elected officials <br />meeting. <br />Ms. Ortiz was worried that it would not be advisable for the City, Lane County, or other areas to opt out of <br />SB1145 as it would require repayment of funds granted by the bill. <br />Ms. Wilson noted that she would solicit input from the Cities of Springfield and Cottage Grove, and Lane <br />County and then report back to the CCIGR. <br />Peeping Tom Law <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson noted that a Eugene police officer had suggested the peeping tom legislative concept and that the <br />suggested legislation would make it a felony rather than a misdemeanor to install equipment to make an <br />audio or visual recording of someone in the nude when they have a reasonable expectation of privacy. She <br />added that a similar bill introduced in 2007 would have made it a felony even if a recording had not been <br />made or if the person being viewed was a minor. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES— Council Committee on Intergovernmental December 3, 2008 Page 2 <br />Relations <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.