Ordinance No. 20435 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

attempt to address a service complaint, provided that the supervisor prepares and forwards to the auditor within 24 hours a report identifying the complainant and contact information for the complainant, and explaining the nature of the service complaint and the outcome of the supervisor's conversation with the complainant. (c) If the chief of police determines that all or a part of an administrative investigation should be postponed in order to avoid jeopardizing a criminal investigation or prosecution, the chief of police shall request the auditor's agreement on postponement. If the auditor and chief of police are unable to agree on the postponement, then they shall present in writing their respective positions to the municipal court judge, who shall then decide whether all or part of an administrative investigation will be postponed. (d) The police auditor shall actively monitor internal investigations to ensure a thorough, objective, and timely investigation, and is authorized to: 1 . Participate in complainant, employee and witness interviews; 2. Require the city to undertake additional investigation. (e) The police auditor may require, and is authorized to contract for, an external investigation when the police auditor determines that an external investigation is appropriate. (f) The police auditor will not be directly involved in any criminal investigations, but shall be kept apprised of the status of such investigations involving police employees. The police auditor shall have access to the case file relevant to the administrative portion of such investigations. (g) All case files shall be provided to the police auditor upon conclusion of the investigation for review and a determination that the investigation was thorough and complete. Once the investigation is deemed complete, the involved employee's immediate supervisor will confer with the police auditor and develop a case adjudication recommendation that will be forwarded through the chain of command to the chief of police for final adjudication. If the police auditor disagrees with the supervisor's recommendation, his/her disagreements and comments will be documented and forwarded to the chief of police as well. The immediate supervisor and police auditor will use their best efforts to complete this process in a timely manner and without unreasonably delaying the final adjudication of the case. If the investigation reveals evidence of criminal conduct not previously known, the auditor may refer the matter to the appropriate criminal prosecutor for his/her consideration. (h) The auditor's office will make every reasonable effort to notify the complainant that an investigation has been conducted, summarize Ordinance -- Page 6 of 8