My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2: Ordinances on Minor Code Amendments (MiCAP Remand)
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 09/21/09 Public Hearing
>
Item 2: Ordinances on Minor Code Amendments (MiCAP Remand)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:21:00 PM
Creation date
9/17/2009 2:22:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/21/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1“Within three years of TransPlan adoption, apply the ND, Nodal Development <br />2designation to areas selected by each jurisdiction, adopt and apply measures to <br />3protect designated nodes from incompatible development and adopt a <br />4schedule for completion of nodal plans and implementing ordinances.” <br />5The Land Use Policy #5 three-year deadline to apply the ND designation and apply <br />14 <br />6measures to protect nodes from incompatible development was requested by DLCD. <br />7According to petitioner, that three-year deadline expired four years ago and the city has yet <br />8to designate nodes. Petitioner contends that requiring additional off-street parking for <br />9multiple family development in areas of the city that have been identified as potential nodal <br />10development areas is inconsistent with the above TransPlan policies. In particular, petitioner <br />11argues that introducing such additional parking is inconsistent with the city’s obligation <br />12under Land Use Policy #5 to “protect designated nodes from incompatible development.” <br />13The city adopted the following findings to reject arguments that were presented to the <br />14city below that Ordinance 20418 is inconsistent with TransPlan’s nodal development <br />15policies: <br />16“* * * DLCD raises a concern that the increase in parking requirements for <br />17new multi-family developments in the West University and South University <br />18neighborhoods will encourage automobile use in the nodal area. Like the <br />19South University neighborhood, a portion of the West University <br />20neighborhood is identified in the TransPlan as being part of a ‘Potential Nodal <br />21Development Area,’ but no portion of the neighborhood has received the <br />22Nodal Development Area designation in the Metro Plan and no portion has <br />23been rezoned to include the /ND Nodal Development overlay zone. <br />24“It is not clear that any of the areas affected by the height and parking <br />25amendments will be designated and zoned as nodal areas for purposes of the <br />14 <br /> The text in TransPlan following Land Use Policy #5 explains: <br />“This policy was added at the request of the Department of Land Conservation and <br />Development Commission. The nodal development strategy anticipates a significant change <br />in development patterns within proposed nodes. Development of these areas under existing <br />plan designations and zoning provisions could result in development patterns inconsistent <br />with nodal development. This policy documents a commitment by the elected officials to <br />apply the new /ND nodal development Metro Plan designation and new zoning regulations to <br />priority nodal development areas within three years of TransPlan adoption, subject to <br />available funding.” <br />Page 28 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.