My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2: Resolution Amending MWMC Regional Wastewater SDC Methodology
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 11/16/09 Public Hearing
>
Item 2: Resolution Amending MWMC Regional Wastewater SDC Methodology
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:22:51 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 11:02:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20-Year Project List <br /> <br />Allocate to Process Components <br />STEP I-1 <br />STEP I-2 <br /> Allocate to System Capacity Parameters <br /> Avg. Flow Peak Flow BOD TSS <br /> Allocate to Project Type <br />STEP I-3 <br />Performance Rehabilitation Capacity <br />STEP I-4 Allocate to User Type <br />% of Total Future % of Capacity <br />Load Expansion <br /> 0% <br />Allocation Basis <br />The allocation of future projects to facility process components is generally fairly <br />straightforward, as most projects relate directly to an individual component or support the <br />entire treatment system. The refinement of the facility component allocation process for <br />MWMC relates to recognition of peak flow management costs. While it is likely that future <br />project lists will include projects entirely related to peak flow management, it is also likely <br />that portions of projects relating to various aspects of the treatment process (e.g., secondary <br />treatment) will also play a role in future peak flow management. <br />The following question needs to be answered when allocating project costs to facility <br />components: “Which specific facility component does the project expand or improve?” If the <br />project expands or improves more than one facility component, then project costs should be <br />apportioned relative to the expansion or improvement of each applicable component. <br />The allocation fractions from Table 3 are used to distribute costs by facility component to <br />capacity parameter, as was done for the existing system cost allocations. The basis for these <br />allocations is described in Appendix B. <br /> <br /> <br />Step I-3 of the project cost allocation methodology is to allocate costs to project types. The <br />three project types, which are intended to be representative of the complete project list, are: <br />1.—Projects or portions of projects that are related to increasing liquids and/or <br />Capacity <br /> <br />biosolids conveyance, treatment, and disposition capacity beyond existing design <br />Page 14 OF 39 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.