Laserfiche WebLink
C. The present single standard for sidewalks should be replaced <br />a set of criteria that would give r (1) p by <br />g ecogni ti i on to different <br />kinds of ' <br />terrain , (2) the desirability of preserving natural <br />phenomena such as trees or rocks, and (3) the esthetic ossi bi l i ti e <br />provided by allowing a variety of surfacing m (which, p s - <br />of course must y g aterials <br />meet tests of safety and durability ). <br />D. - The Council should undertake a systematic oro ram of r r� �airin <br />sidewalks to be installed in all built-up Eg <br />consideration bei g iven to rou p areas , wi th first <br />g utes and approaches to schools. <br />E 89 The city a�xf should undertake a sys telmati c r <br />of grading roads which are not curbed and g uttered ) , P ograr� <br />� so t footp hat a foot ava <br />th p is on at least one side of <br />e road. <br />F. - i n e city s hou ld �1 e.�e l rip .�..�cir�., f,�, �;�,e -.r <br />-` a echedu le ar lernertti <br />a tic c Z e route la n . - emen <br />3. planning and Design of Traffic Thoroughfares. <br />A. The hig;tway 's impact can nei ghborhoods and the envirownen t sh <br />be considered are we ll as motorists' convenience and safety, <br />B. Future route se l ee ti cr, Hhc u ld consider ind :rest, as well as <br />d irect, coc t of cons t ruc t ir�n . <br />C. Future route sele ction and de si of thorouq fares sh ou l d <br />the needs o u l c transit — op erati on <br />, hau�.d consider <br />D. LGr Abu t ting land uses shou be protested rom � <br />of highi.�ays, and � he hirr f , t .e adverse effects <br />deve l „hwa from incompatible ad�join;:n <br />apmen t e . 9 <br />�.A Heavy t raffic should be - I i mi ted to as few streets as possible, <br />l <br />Depending on our success in makltng aZternative mean of trans - ortution <br />attractive a cG •• . s tru c o of limitd access roa s w i <br />prop or ions ly more traffic, �s- essemtW m c carry <br />and more of our resent - be necessa i l a,ffic i f more <br />• N streets are no o b ecome eavy r carriers., <br />r <br />� The use of one -way streets is to be <br />neighborhood; whenever avoided in residential <br />Possible, <br />3} Varying street widths and p a <br />or di scours a thr sterns should be u:ied to encoura e <br />g ough traffic, g <br />4} Heavy traffi should be disco uraged through resi dential areas. <br />�Ri vers t ty- eampus <br />F. whenever oss i bl e ! <br />P , additional traffic should be ac:commod <br />the removal of parking and the provi i _ aced by <br />in preference to wideni p on of off- parking, <br />26 <br />