Laserfiche WebLink
<br />consistent with the WAP and Metro Plan designations. A second notice was sent to the CYNA, <br />applicant, and interested parties (including three neighbors who provided testimony) informing them of <br />the Hearing’s Official’s decision and the right to appeal. No appeals were received. <br /> <br />The 2011 Housing RFP Process and Results <br />HPB commenced creation of the 2011 RFP in October 2010 for development of the County Farm site. <br />Between October 2010 and March 2011, input was solicited on multiple occasions from developers, <br />service providers, the neighborhood association, and community members as the RFP document was <br />drafted. A summary of early efforts made to solicit input is attached (Attachment B). The City <br />announced the 2011 Housing RFP for affordable housing projects in The Register-Guard and via an <br />HPB interested parties list March 11, 2011, with proposals due the last day of May. The 2011 Housing <br />RFP sought proposals for: (1) New affordable housing development on the 5.8-acre County Farm <br />landbank site, including use of HOME funds, Eugene SDC waivers, and Eugene Water & Electric Board <br />(EWEB) SDC grants; and (2) acquisition/rehabilitation of existing housing to be converted to affordable <br />housing, including use of HOME funding, Eugene SDC waivers, and EWEB SDC grants. <br /> <br />Through the RFP process, $601,206 in HOME funds, approximately $805,000 in Eugene SDC waivers, <br />and $100,000 in EWEB SDC grants were made available, for a total of $1,495,000 in development <br />subsidies. <br /> <br />Two proposals were received for the development of new housing on the County Farm landbank site. A <br />single proposal was received for acquisition of existing housing, but was deemed incomplete and not <br />evaluated. The two proposals for the landbank site were reviewed by staff and the HPB-appointed <br />Eugene Evaluation Committee (see Attachment C for member list). In June, the Evaluation Committee <br />held a public meeting and scored the development proposals using criteria developed by the HPB. In <br />July, the HPB reviewed the scores for each proposal provided by the Evaluation Committee. The HPB <br />acknowledged the thorough technical analysis of the proposals by the Evaluation Committee and made a <br />draft recommendation to award resources to the Bascom Village proposal (Attachment D). <br /> <br />Bascom Village includes 101 units (comprising of 74 units with two or more bedrooms targeted to <br />families and 27 units targeted to seniors, singles, and couples) and two community centers within 29 <br />structures constructed in two phases (53 units in phase I and 48 in phase II). The 29 structures consist of <br />17 two-story townhome style duplexes, eight three-story apartment buildings, one single-story <br />community center, two combination one- and two-story buildings, and one two-story community center <br />that includes a classroom and five flats. The two-story buildings along Park View Drive are similar in <br />height to the existing single- family homes in the Mountain Terrace subdivision, north of Park View <br />Drive. The three-story buildings on the south property line are designed to be within the maximum <br />height of 35 feet. Included on-site are two community centers, laundry facilities and several play areas. <br />The first phase will be completed by St. Vincent de Paul of Lane County (SVDP), with the second <br />developed by the Housing and Community Services Agency of Lane County (HACSA). Once <br />complete, both phases will be managed by SVDP and include resident services delivered by SVDP. <br />SVDP and HACSA formed a team of local professionals to design and develop Bascom Village. The <br />design team includes Eugene-based companies, Bergsund DeLaney Architecture and Planning, P.C. and <br />Meili Construction. SVDP and HACSA have strong development and property management track <br />records. Both vigorously screen prospective tenants (in some cases, more so than market-rate owners). <br /> <br /> S:\CMO\2011 Council Agendas\M111116\S111116B.doc <br />